Tracking mass layoff and plant closure notices filed under the WARN Act in Indiana, updated daily. Explore the interactive data →
Workers affected by industry sector
Workers affected by notice type
Monthly WARN notices and workers affected
Get Indiana Layoff Alerts
Free daily alerts for new WARN Act filings in Indiana.
# Indiana's Layoff Crisis: A Decade of Decline and the COVID Inflection Point
Indiana has experienced 1,378 WARN Act notices affecting 161,447 workers over the past two decades, marking a state in structural economic distress. The data reveals a labor market fundamentally reshaped by three distinct forces: the Great Recession's immediate shock, a decade of managed but persistent decline, and a catastrophic acceleration during 2020 that permanently altered Indiana's employment landscape. The 2020 pandemic alone accounts for 297 notices displacing 39,320 workers—nearly one-quarter of all layoffs in the dataset spanning from 2008 to 2026. What distinguishes Indiana's layoff profile is not merely the volume but its concentration: manufacturing-dependent regions hemorrhaging jobs to automation and offshoring, accommodation and food services creating precarious employment that vanishes instantly during economic shocks, and a few mega-employers wielding outsized influence over entire regional economies. The trajectory since 2020 shows modest stabilization rather than recovery, with 2024-2025 notices remaining elevated compared to pre-pandemic baselines.
Indiana's layoff patterns cannot be understood apart from the state's fundamental economic identity as a manufacturing powerhouse. The data confirms what regional economists have documented for a decade: Manufacturing drives layoff notices proportionally but represents a smaller absolute share than might be expected given Indiana's industrial heritage. Sixty-one manufacturing notices displaced 5,061 workers—only 3.1 percent of total layoffs by headcount despite representing 4.4 percent of all notices. This paradox reveals a critical insight: manufacturing layoffs in Indiana are increasingly concentrated among a handful of massive operations rather than distributed across numerous mid-sized employers.
The presence of U.S. Steel Corporation exemplifies this concentration. The company filed five notices displacing 1,278 workers, but when combined with "United States Steel Corporation" entries (likely administrative duplications or facility-level reporting), the total reaches approximately 5,754 workers across eight filings. For context, this represents 3.6 percent of Indiana's total layoff volume from a single company. ArcelorMittal, another integrated steel producer, filed six notices affecting 978 workers. Together, these two steel giants account for approximately 6,700 workers—more than the entire Education sector layoffs across the entire period.
The structural dynamics here reflect global overcapacity in steel production, tariff-driven trade volatility, and automation of blast furnace operations requiring fewer workers per ton of output. Indiana's steel corridor—anchored by the Lake Michigan industrial complex in East Chicago, Hammond, and Gary—represents one of America's most consequential casualty zones in deindustrialization. The presence of 17 notices in East Chicago affecting 3,139 workers underscores how layoffs concentrate in narrow geographic corridors dependent on single industries.
Beyond steel, Caterpillar (four notices, 1,588 workers), BorgWarner (four notices, 1,026 workers), and Strick Trailers, LLC (six notices, 698 workers) reveal automotive supply chain turbulence. These companies experienced multiple separate workforce reductions, suggesting sustained pressure rather than one-time restructurings. The automotive sector's transition toward electrification, combined with supply chain reconfiguration following the 2008 crisis, created perpetual headwinds for traditional suppliers. Component manufacturers and trailer producers lack the direct consumer relationship of vehicle assemblers, making them vulnerable to tier-one consolidation and outsourcing to lower-cost jurisdictions.
The most striking finding in this dataset emerges not from traditional manufacturing but from Accommodation & Food Services, which generated 62 notices affecting 6,512 workers. While this sector appears third in absolute worker displacement, it ranks first in notice frequency—a ratio indicating numerous small-to-medium operations experiencing workforce reductions rather than a few catastrophic collapses. This pattern reveals an industry characterized by thin profit margins, low barriers to entry and exit, and extreme vulnerability to demand shocks.
The pandemic's impact crystallizes this vulnerability. Sodexo, a food service contractor, filed seven notices—more than any other individual company in the dataset—affecting 351 workers. Beneath aggregate sector numbers lie dozens of regional restaurants, hotels, and hospitality enterprises that filed notices across Indiana's service economy. Indianapolis alone accounts for 237 notices, suggesting that the state capital's convention center, hotel corridors, and entertainment districts experienced sequential waves of workforce adjustment as demand patterns shifted from business travel toward leisure travel with different staffing requirements.
The frequency of accommodation and food service notices relative to worker displacement suggests that many affected workers found alternative employment quickly, as the data contains no record of facility closures for most hospitality establishments. This contrasts sharply with manufacturing closures, which typically eliminate employment permanently. However, the seven separate notices from a single company like Sodexo indicate that labor shedding in this sector operates through continuous attrition and repeated workforce adjustments rather than wholesale facility shuttering.
Indiana's layoff geography tells a story of uneven regional decline. Indianapolis dominates the data with 237 notices affecting 31,355 workers—representing 19.4 percent of the state's total layoff volume. This concentration reflects the state capital's role as Indiana's largest metropolitan area, but also the precarious dependence of service-sector economies on recurring demand shocks. The city's major layoff years correlate closely with broader economic disruptions: hospitality and convention center closures during 2020, retail consolidations throughout the decade, and media industry contraction following the shift from print to digital advertising.
Beyond Indianapolis, a tier of industrial cities experiences sustained distress. Fort Wayne (39 notices, 3,718 workers), Elkhart (35 notices, 2,928 workers), and South Bend (34 notices, 3,542 workers) form a manufacturing corridor where automotive supply chains concentrate. Each city experienced a layoff burden representing roughly 2.3 percent of the state's total, indicating that while manufacturing affects fewer workers than service sectors statewide, its impact on particular regions approaches catastrophic concentration. Elkhart County historically specializes in recreational vehicle manufacturing, a notoriously cyclical industry vulnerable to interest rate shocks and consumer discretionary spending shifts.
The presence of Plainfield (29 notices, 4,245 workers) reflects the concentration of distribution and logistics operations in the Indianapolis metropolitan area's outer ring. The relatively high worker-to-notice ratio in Plainfield suggests large warehouse operations, consistent with Indiana's development as a Midwest logistics hub. Evansville (33 notices, 3,403 workers), positioned in southwestern Indiana as a regional manufacturing center, experienced proportionally severe layoff volume. The city's older industrial base, coupled with limited economic diversification, creates vulnerability to sector-wide restructuring.
What emerges from the geographic analysis is not random layoff distribution but strategic concentration in three complementary economic zones: the Lake Michigan industrial corridor dependent on steel and heavy manufacturing; the northern automotive supply chain centered on Fort Wayne, Elkhart, and South Bend; and the Indianapolis metro area's service economy. Workers in these regions face structurally elevated layoff risk compared to suburban and rural Indiana communities, which receive far fewer notices.
The historical trajectory of Indiana's layoffs reveals a state economy that absorbed the Great Recession's blow (2008-2009), experienced a decade of slow adjustment, and then suffered a catastrophic shock in 2020. The 2008-2009 period generated 189 notices affecting 31,510 workers—a severe but concentrated crisis. The following decade (2010-2019) saw 451 notices affecting 59,819 workers, reflecting an annual average of 45 notices and 5,982 workers. This represented a new baseline of structural job loss that persisted regardless of broader economic conditions.
Then came 2020: 297 notices affecting 39,320 workers. This single year exceeded any previous year in absolute notice frequency and matched the entire 2008-2009 crisis in worker displacement. The pandemic created an anomaly in layoff patterns—simultaneous mass displacement across multiple sectors rather than the sectoral concentration typical of structural adjustment. Hospitality, retail, education (school closures), and manufacturing all experienced synchronized workforce reductions.
Since 2020, the trajectory suggests partial recovery mixed with persistent disruption. The 2021-2022 period generated only 67 notices affecting 9,389 workers, suggesting some stabilization. However, 2023-2024 returned to elevated notice frequency (53 and 47 notices respectively), indicating that layoffs remain above pre-2020 trends. The forward-looking data for 2025-2026, while limited in sample size (41 and 7 notices), suggests notices may trend downward, though final conclusions remain premature given incomplete filing information.
The distinction between closure and layoff notices reveals additional complexity. Closures account for 480 notices—the plurality—suggesting that a significant portion of Indiana's job losses reflect permanent facility shuttering rather than temporary workforce adjustments. Layoffs proper account for 363 notices, while 535 remain classified as unknown. The predominance of closures indicates that Indiana's labor market is not merely adjusting employment levels but losing entire productive capacity—a distinction with profound implications for worker retraining and community recovery.
Beyond aggregate industry and geographic patterns, Indiana's layoff vulnerability concentrates among a handful of employers whose decisions affect thousands of workers. Walmart filed four notices affecting 1,597 workers, reflecting the retail sector's ongoing retrenchment and store consolidation following the shift toward e-commerce. The company's layoffs span multiple years and locations, indicating systematic workforce optimization rather than crisis response.
Eli Lilly and Company, a pharmaceutical manufacturer headquartered in Indianapolis, filed five notices affecting 757 workers. Despite Lilly's reputation as a stable, growing employer, the notices suggest ongoing manufacturing optimization and potential consolidation of production facilities. For a company with substantial global operations, Indiana-based reductions may reflect shifting production geographies or automation of chemical synthesis processes. Dometic Corporation (three notices, 356 workers), TeleServices Direct (three notices, 657 workers), and DHL Express (five notices, 323 workers) represent additional large employers experiencing workforce instability.
The retail sector's distress appears through Kmart Corporation - Sears Holdings entries (three notices, 383 workers) and Kmart separately (three notices, 211 workers). These notices predate the final liquidation of Sears stores but reflect the extended decline of American department store retail. The duplication in Kmart/Sears filings suggests either administrative distinctions between operating entities or multiple rounds of layoffs as the company contracted toward bankruptcy.
Media industry decline shows through Gannett notices (three notices, 146 workers), reflecting the structural disruption to newspaper publishing from digital competition. Publishing's emergence as a significant layoff driver—despite modest absolute numbers—signals the complete transformation of information industries over the past fifteen years.
Indiana's layoff patterns reflect a state economy deeply embedded in sectors experiencing secular headwinds. The state's GDP structure remains disproportionately dependent on manufacturing—approximately 17 percent of state output compared to the national average of 12 percent. Within manufacturing, Indiana concentrates in petroleum refining, steel production, and automotive components—precisely the sectors most vulnerable to automation, offshoring, and energy transition pressures.
The state's traditional advantages—geographic proximity to the Great Lakes for water transportation, established industrial infrastructure, relatively low labor costs compared to coastal states—increasingly offer diminished competitive advantage. Automation reduces the relevance of labor costs, while truck and rail transportation have become the dominant logistics modes. The state's aging industrial base requires continuous capital investment to compete with newer facilities in lower-cost jurisdictions.
Indiana's service sector, led by hospitality, retail, and food services, expanded to fill employment gaps left by manufacturing decline. However, this shift created a workforce concentrated in low-wage, high-vulnerability employment precisely where demand fluctuates most dramatically. The 2020 pandemic exposed this vulnerability instantly, as hospitality and food service employment collapsed simultaneously across the state.
The trajectory of Indiana's layoffs suggests a state economy unlikely to experience dramatic recovery in coming years. The structural factors driving manufacturing decline—globalization, automation, energy transition—will persist and likely intensify. The state faces particular exposure as automotive manufacturers accelerate electrification, potentially rendering some traditional supplier capabilities obsolete. Battery manufacturing and electric vehicle assembly offer new opportunities, but these industries concentrate in other states and regions.
For workers and job seekers, the data indicates that sectoral and geographic risk remains highly unequal. Employment in manufacturing-dependent regions and hospitality-concentrated cities carries elevated permanent displacement risk. Career transitions into healthcare, professional services, and advanced manufacturing require educational investments that not all affected workers can access. Indiana's community college system, historically strong in technical training, will face substantial demand from workers needing retraining across Elkhart, Fort Wayne, and the Lake Michigan corridor.
Policymakers confronting this data should recognize that WARN Act notices capture only formal workforce reductions, excluding the broader ecosystem of reduced hours, benefit cuts, and wage stagnation that characterize economic distress in affected regions. The 161,447 workers formally displaced over eighteen years represent only the visible portion of labor market disruption. Supporting workforce development, infrastructure investment in distressed regions, and diversification incentives for manufacturing-dependent communities represents the essential policy response to these documented economic forces.
