Jabil Layoffs
All WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices filed by Jabil.
Data Insights
Industry Breakdown
Workers affected by industry sector
Layoff Types
Workers affected by notice type
Jabil WARN Act Filings
| Company | Location | Employees | Notice Date | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jabil | Lake Forest, CA | 21 | ||
| Jabil | Lake Forest, CA | 393 | ||
| Jabil | San Jose, CA | 21 | Closure | |
| Jabil | Lake Forest, CA | 21 | ||
| Jabil | Lake Forest, CA | 55 | Closure | |
| Jabil | Richardson, TX | 136 | ||
| Jabil | , KY | 108 | Layoff | |
| Jabil | Lake Forest, CA | 156 | Temporary Closure | |
| Jabil | Lake Forest, CA | 59 | Temporary Closure | |
| Jabil | San Jose, CA | 472 | Closure | |
| Jabil | , NM | 130 | ||
| Jabil | Lake Forest, CA | 43 | Permanent Closure | |
| Jabil | Vancouver, WA | 120 | ||
| Jabil | San Jose, CA | 9 | Closure | |
| Jabil | Lake Forest, CA | 9 | Permanent Closure | |
| Jabil | San Jose, CA | 84 | Closure | |
| Jabil | San Jose, CA | 550 | Closure | |
| Jabil | Lake Forest, CA | 69 | Layoff | |
| Jabil | Fremont, CA | 138 | Layoff | |
| Jabil | Fremont, CA | 140 | Layoff |
Get Layoff Alerts
Free daily alerts for new WARN Act filings.
Analysis: Jabil Layoff History
# Jabil's Layoff Footprint: An Analysis of 83 WARN Notices and 11,999 Displaced Workers
The Scale and Significance of Jabil's Workforce Reductions
Jabil Circuit's layoff activity, captured across 83 WARN Act notices affecting 11,999 workers, represents a significant and sustained restructuring of the company's North American operations. To contextualize this scale: Jabil's WARN filing count places it among the more prolific restructuring companies tracked by WARN Firehose, with nearly 12,000 workers representing a substantial portion of the company's total workforce. For comparison, this level of documented separation activity suggests either a company undergoing fundamental operational changes or one managing persistent market pressures through repeated workforce adjustments.
The composition of these reductions reveals critical patterns about Jabil's business strategy. Of the 83 notices filed, 35 are explicitly classified as facility closures—representing 42% of all notices. Another 10 are temporary closures, which often precede permanent shutdowns or extended operational suspensions. Only 16 notices are classified as simple layoffs without facility closure, while 19 remain unclassified in terms of closure versus reduction. This distribution signals that Jabil is not merely trimming headcount through attrition or selective reductions; rather, the company has systematically closed manufacturing and operations facilities across multiple states. The prevalence of closures over simple layoffs indicates that Jabil's restructuring involves eliminating entire operational units rather than right-sizing existing ones.
The workforce impact extends beyond raw numbers. The 11,999 affected workers span multiple states and dozens of communities, creating localized economic disruption in areas dependent on Jabil's manufacturing operations. Manufacturing employment carries particular weight in regional economies due to multiplier effects—a shuttered Jabil facility doesn't just displace direct workers but also reduces demand at suppliers, logistics providers, and local service businesses. The concentration of Jabil's activity in industrial regions suggests these communities face meaningful job market headwinds.
Timeline and Escalation: A Company in Continuous Restructuring
Jabil's WARN filing history reveals no period of stability but rather a pattern of escalating activity punctuated by particularly severe years. The earliest notice in this dataset dates to 2013, when a single event in Tempe, Arizona displaced 615 workers, setting a concerning baseline. The period from 2013 through 2017 shows minimal activity, suggesting Jabil's major restructuring began in earnest in 2018.
The 2018-2019 biennium marks the opening phase of sustained reduction activity. In 2018 alone, Jabil filed nine notices affecting 1,688 workers, followed by seven notices in 2019 affecting 959 workers. Critically, the largest single event during this period occurred on October 24, 2018, when a facility closure in San Jose, California displaced 562 workers in a single event. This was followed weeks later by a 529-worker closure in the same city on September 27, 2019. These large, concentrated events suggest that Jabil faced significant operational challenges in its California heartland during this period.
The 2020-2021 period shows deceleration, with only four notices filed in each year affecting 693 and 422 workers respectively. This dip likely reflects the pandemic's initial shock, during which companies froze major restructuring announcements. However, 2022 represents a dramatic acceleration, with 15 notices filed affecting 2,422 workers—a sudden intensification of restructuring activity. The data shows that October 2022 was particularly severe: a 549-worker temporary closure in an unspecified California location on October 24, 2022, followed immediately by a 549-worker permanent closure in Fremont, California on October 25, 2022, and a 484-worker closure in San Jose, California on October 20, 2022.
The pattern reaches its peak in 2023, when 24 notices were filed affecting 2,920 workers—by far the highest annual count in the dataset. This represents an acceleration from 2022, indicating that Jabil's restructuring intensified rather than moderated. Notable 2023 events include a 550-worker temporary closure and a 550-worker permanent closure in San Jose, California, reflecting continued concentration of major reductions in this metropolitan area.
The 2024 figures show 14 notices affecting 1,824 workers, suggesting the restructuring has not significantly slowed despite already affecting nearly 12,000 workers. Five additional notices in 2025 (affecting 456 workers) indicate the restructuring trajectory continues into the current year. Across the full timeline, the pattern demonstrates no meaningful deceleration; rather, 2023 represents a peak followed by continued significant activity. This is consistent with a company undergoing long-term business model transformation rather than temporary adjustments.
Geographic Concentration and the California Concentration
The geographic distribution of Jabil's WARN filings reveals an almost extreme concentration in California. Of 83 total notices, 73—nearly 88 percent—originate from California alone, affecting 10,657 of the 11,999 total workers, or 89 percent of all displaced employees. This degree of concentration is striking and suggests that California contains Jabil's primary North American manufacturing and operations footprint.
Within California, the concentration deepens further. San Jose dominates the dataset with 16 notices affecting 4,490 workers across the entire timeline. This single metropolitan area accounts for 37 percent of all Jabil WARN notices and 37 percent of all affected workers. San Jose has experienced near-continuous Jabil reductions since 2018, with the largest single events occurring there: the 562-worker closure in 2018, the 529-worker closure in 2019, the 515-worker closure in 2020, the 484-worker closure in 2022, and the 550-worker closure in 2023. This pattern indicates that San Jose has borne a disproportionate burden of Jabil's restructuring.
Fremont, California ranks second with 8 notices affecting 1,577 workers. Like San Jose, Fremont has experienced continuous reductions spanning multiple years, including the substantial 549-worker permanent closure in October 2022. Livermore, California, Manteca, California, and Lake Forest, California each show 4 notices, indicating secondary operational centers. Chula Vista, California and Benicia, California each show 2 notices. Collectively, these seven California municipalities account for 39 notices—nearly 47 percent of all Jabil's national WARN filings.
Beyond California, Jabil's footprint becomes minimal. Texas shows 2 notices affecting 136 workers, with activity concentrated in Richardson. New York shows 2 notices affecting 166 workers, with both filed from Poughkeepsie. Iowa shows 2 notices affecting 67 workers from Mount Pleasant. Single notices appear from Arizona (Tempe, 615 workers), New Mexico (Albuquerque, 130 workers), Washington (Vancouver, 120 workers), and Kentucky (108 workers).
This geographic pattern carries significant implications. California, particularly the San Jose metropolitan region and surrounding Bay Area communities, faces an outsized impact from Jabil's restructuring. For California labor markets, particularly in manufacturing and industrial operations, Jabil represents a meaningful source of displacement. The concentration also suggests that Jabil's remaining North American operations, if any, are heavily weighted toward California, making the state's economy particularly exposed to Jabil's business performance.
The Nature of Reductions: Closures Over Layoffs
The composition of Jabil's workforce reductions by type reveals that the company is reshaping its operational footprint through facility closures rather than selective reductions. Thirty-five notices involve permanent facility closures, representing 42 percent of all notices. An additional 10 notices involve temporary closures, which in many cases preceded permanent shutdowns or extended suspensions. Only 16 notices are classified as simple layoffs—reductions at continuing facilities—comprising just 19 percent of the total. Three additional notices involve temporary layoffs. This distribution has profound implications for affected workers.
Facility closures carry different consequences than simple layoffs. When a facility closes, workers cannot be reassigned within the company; they face complete separation from Jabil. In contrast, layoffs at continuing facilities sometimes allow for internal job transfers, though such opportunities are often limited. The 35 permanent closures affecting approximately 6,000-7,000 workers (based on the closure classification) represent complete operational eliminations, not workforce reductions. The 19 unclassified notices, while unclear in nature, likely include additional closures based on the dataset's overall pattern.
The largest single events in Jabil's WARN history all involve closures or temporary closures. The 562-worker event in San Jose in 2018 was a closure. The 550-worker temporary closure in an unknown California location in 2023 and the matching 550-worker permanent closure in San Jose in 2023 both represent facility-level reductions. The 549-worker closure in Fremont in 2022 and the 549-worker temporary closure in California in 2022 similarly represent wholesale facility operations. Among the top ten largest individual events, nine involve closures or temporary closures, and the remaining event (the 615-worker 2013 Tempe event) is unclassified but likely a closure given its magnitude and isolation.
This pattern indicates that Jabil's business strategy during this period has involved consolidating operations, closing redundant or underperforming facilities, and potentially shifting manufacturing to other regions or offshore locations. The repeated closures across California suggest that Jabil found maintaining this concentration of facilities economically unsustainable or strategically misaligned with evolving business needs.
Workforce Implications and Cumulative Impact
The cumulative impact on workers extends beyond immediate displacement. The 11,999 workers affected by WARN notices represent individuals facing job loss, income disruption, and the stress of labor market transition. Manufacturing workers, Jabil's primary workforce, typically earn middle-class wages but face challenges in labor market transitions, particularly in regions where manufacturing employment has declined.
The timing and clustering of reductions create additional complexity. Workers displaced in 2023 and 2024 face a different labor market than those displaced in 2018 or 2019, yet the continuous stream of notices across years suggests that Jabil has maintained some baseline operational level while progressively reducing it. The temporary closures and layoffs scattered throughout the timeline may have also created uncertainty for remaining workers, depressing morale and retention.
The geographic concentration in California, particularly around San Jose and the Bay Area, places these reductions in a region where manufacturing employment has been in secular decline for decades. Displaced Jabil workers in San Jose must compete for manufacturing jobs in a regional economy that has increasingly shifted toward technology services, finance, and professional services. The few alternative manufacturing employers in the region face different skill requirements and often lower wage structures than Jabil.
For workers in secondary locations like Poughkeepsie, New York or Albuquerque, New Mexico, local labor markets may be even more challenging. These communities often lack the density of alternative employers present in major metropolitan areas, making job transitions more difficult.
Industrial Context and Sector Dynamics
Jabil operates as a contract electronics manufacturer and provides supply chain solutions to major technology companies. The company's WARN activity must be understood within this sector context. Electronics manufacturing in North America faces sustained pressure from offshore competition, automation, and shifting customer demands. The 2018-2024 period coincides with significant industry-wide challenges including trade tensions, supply chain disruptions, and accelerating automation.
Jabil's concentration of closures in California suggests particular challenges in maintaining high-cost U.S. manufacturing operations in a state with elevated labor costs and operational expenses. The shift away from California-based manufacturing may reflect Jabil's strategic decision to consolidate operations elsewhere or offshore production to lower-cost regions. Alternatively, it may reflect declining customer demand for services Jabil previously provided at California facilities.
The manufacturing classification applied to seven notices in the dataset aligns with Jabil's core business model, though the limited classification data suggests many notices lack detailed industry coding in the WARN system.
Implications and Ongoing Considerations
Jabil's WARN filing history documents a company in substantial transition. The 83 notices and 11,999 affected workers represent one of the more significant private-sector restructuring efforts in recent years. For California labor markets, the concentration of activity creates regional ripple effects extending beyond direct Jabil workers to suppliers and service providers.
The absence of significant deceleration through 2025 suggests Jabil's restructuring remains incomplete or ongoing. Whether this represents a multi-year operational transition to a new business model or a company in secular decline remains a question for business analysis, but the WARN data itself is clear: Jabil has fundamentally reduced its North American operational footprint over this period, particularly in California, and continues to do so.