Skip to main content

WARN Act Layoffs in Davenport, Iowa

WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in Davenport, Iowa, updated daily.

20
Notices (All Time)
1,310
Workers Affected
Abb
Biggest Filing (247)
Manufacturing
Top Industry

Data Insights

Industry Breakdown

Workers affected by industry sector

Layoff Types

Workers affected by notice type

Recent WARN Notices in Davenport

WARN Act layoff notices
CompanyCityEmployeesNotice DateType
Superior Tube ProductsDavenport2
Superior Tube ProductsDavenport28Closure
Burlington TrailwaysDavenport7Closure
Quad City TimesDavenport49Layoff
John Deere Davenport WorksDavenport80Layoff
John Deere Davenport WorksDavenport211Layoff
Family ResourcesDavenport26Layoff
David's BridalDavenport26
Lutheran Service in IowaDavenport20Layoff
David's BridalDavenport22Layoff
Duraham School ServicesDavenport129Layoff
divvyDOSEDavenport62Layoff
AbbDavenport247
Linwood Mining and MineralsDavenport49Layoff
John Deere Davenport WorksDavenport82Layoff
SodexoDavenport71Layoff
John DeereDavenport57
John DeereDavenport113
UnitedHealthcare Community & StateDavenport27
UnitedHealthcare Community & StateDavenport2Layoff

Analysis: Layoffs in Davenport, Iowa

# Economic Analysis: Layoffs in Davenport, Iowa

Overview: Scale and Significance of Workforce Displacement

Between 2005 and 2025, Davenport, Iowa has experienced 35 WARN Act notices affecting 2,419 workers—a significant workforce disruption for a metropolitan area of roughly 100,000 residents. To contextualize this scale: if these layoffs were distributed evenly across a single year, they would represent approximately 2.4 percent of the city's employed workforce. In reality, the concentration has been far more severe during certain periods, creating acute labor market shocks that ripple through local supply chains, consumer spending, and municipal tax revenue.

The cumulative impact of 2,419 displaced workers carries weight beyond raw numbers. These represent individuals with established job tenure, specialized skills, and embedded social networks within Davenport's economy. Many held middle-class positions in manufacturing and healthcare, sectors that historically provided pathways to stable employment without four-year degrees. The loss of these positions constrains upward mobility for subsequent cohorts and reallocates human capital away from Davenport toward more dynamic labor markets.

Dominance of Manufacturing and John Deere's Outsized Influence

Manufacturing dominates Davenport's WARN notice portfolio, accounting for 11 notices and 1,137 affected workers—representing 46.9 percent of all displacement. This concentration reflects Davenport's historical identity as a manufacturing hub and reveals the sector's ongoing vulnerability to cyclical downturns and structural transformation.

John Deere's presence across multiple facilities underscores this dynamic. The company filed seven separate WARN notices totaling 629 displaced workers—roughly 26 percent of all Davenport layoffs. John Deere Davenport Works alone issued four notices affecting 429 workers, while a separate John Deere entity issued three notices displacing 200 workers. This bifurcated filing structure likely reflects distinct operational units or payroll entities but signals the company's serial workforce adjustments across the Davenport area rather than a single catastrophic closure. The pattern suggests ongoing rationalization of production capacity, automation investments, or consolidation of manufacturing footprints—all hallmarks of mature industrial firms adapting to labor cost pressures and technological displacement.

Beyond John Deere, the manufacturing sector shows fragmentation across mid-sized suppliers and niche producers. Superior Tube Products (2 notices, 30 workers), ABB (1 notice, 247 workers), Interstate Brands (1 notice, 151 workers), and Black Hawk Foundry and Machine (1 notice, 109 workers) collectively represent specialized manufacturing serving broader industrial chains. ABB's single notice displacing 247 workers stands out as a concentrated shock, likely reflecting facility closure or major line shutdown rather than gradual workforce reduction.

Healthcare and Retail: Secondary Displacement Vectors

Healthcare emerges as the second-largest displacement sector with six notices affecting 333 workers (13.8 percent of total displacement). Genesis Health System filed a single notice displacing 196 workers, suggesting a significant administrative reorganization or facility consolidation. UnitedHealthcare Community & State issued two notices affecting 29 workers, indicating ongoing rationalization within the insurance segment of healthcare. This pattern reflects the sector-wide consolidation wave affecting mid-sized regional health systems as they encounter pressure from larger national competitors, Medicare reimbursement constraints, and electronic health record system integration.

Retail displacement totaled five notices affecting 173 workers (7.2 percent), concentrated among apparel and home furnishings. David's Bridal (2 notices, 48 workers) and Sears (2 notices, 42 workers) represent the secular contraction of brick-and-mortar retail as e-commerce, catalog consolidation, and changing consumer preferences erode traditional retail footprints. American TV & Appliance of Mad (1 notice, 83 workers) similarly reflects the appliance retail sector's compressed margins and declining foot traffic. These closures represent not cyclical recessions but structural obsolescence—business models fundamentally incompatible with twenty-first-century consumer behavior.

Transportation displacement totaled three notices affecting 281 workers—a surprisingly large cohort driven primarily by First Student (1 notice, 145 workers) and Duraham School Services (1 notice, 129 workers), school transportation contractors vulnerable to student enrollment fluctuations, route optimization, and municipal budget pressures. Stafanini (1 notice, 177 workers), classified as professional services, likely represents a staffing or logistics firm experiencing client concentration loss or contract non-renewal.

Temporal Patterns: Acceleration and Volatility

The distribution of WARN notices across time reveals three distinct eras. From 2005 through 2015, Davenport averaged fewer than one notice annually, suggesting either robust labor demand absorbing workforce adjustments or statistical underreporting. This period encompasses the Great Recession (2007-2009), when Davenport filed only two notices—a striking absence that may reflect either unrecorded layoffs or genuine recession-induced retrenchment that proceeded through attrition rather than formal WARN notice.

Beginning in 2016, notice frequency accelerated sharply. From 2016 through 2019, Davenport recorded 17 notices affecting over 1,000 workers—a pace nearly four times the pre-2016 average. This acceleration coincides with broader manufacturing sector stress (particularly agricultural equipment), retail sector retrenchment, and healthcare consolidation. The 2018-2019 period (9 notices) represents the peak intensity of displacement.

The 2020-2024 period shows relative stabilization at 12 notices, suggesting either adaptation to new employment equilibria or continued baseline displacement. The four notices filed in 2025 (covering January through early April) project an annualized rate of 12 notices if sustained—consistent with post-2016 norms but substantially elevated relative to 2005-2015 baseline.

This temporal evolution suggests Davenport transitioned from relative stability to structural volatility beginning around 2016. The shift correlates with John Deere's ongoing capital rationalization, accelerating retail closures, and healthcare system consolidation—forces unlikely to reverse absent major new investment or demand shock.

Local Economic Impact: Community Resilience and Vulnerability

The displacement of 2,419 workers across 20 years represents recurrent pressure on Davenport's labor market, household incomes, and municipal finances. For context, Iowa's current insured unemployment rate stands at 1.17 percent—extraordinarily low—yet this masks the local concentration of earlier-year displacement. Communities experiencing serial manufacturing job loss face persistent wage pressure in remaining sectors, as displaced workers compete for service-sector positions that typically offer lower compensation and fewer benefits.

The prominence of John Deere layoffs carries particular significance because John Deere positions are historically high-wage manufacturing jobs offering defined-benefit pensions and comprehensive health coverage—compensation structures unavailable in expanding service sectors. Displacement from John Deere to retail, food service, or temporary staffing represents not merely job change but substantial household income loss, often 30-40 percent reduction in annual earnings.

Davenport's median household income and poverty rates likely bear scars from this displacement pattern. The city's property tax base faces pressure as displaced households reduce discretionary spending, while municipal demand for social services simultaneously increases. Schools experience enrollment volatility as families relocate seeking employment.

Regional Dynamics: Davenport Within Iowa's Broader Context

Iowa's current labor market appears remarkably tight. Initial jobless claims for the week ending April 4, 2026, totaled 1,338 statewide—down 67.6 percent year-over-year and down 45.7 percent over the preceding four weeks. Iowa's insured unemployment rate of 1.17 percent stands meaningfully below the national rate of 1.25 percent, while Iowa's BLS unemployment rate of 3.4 percent (January 2026) also sits below the national rate of 4.3 percent (March 2026).

This aggregate strength masks Davenport's sector-specific vulnerabilities. While statewide labor markets remain robust, driven by agricultural productivity and professional services growth (particularly in Des Moines and Iowa City), Davenport's manufacturing-heavy economy experiences headwinds that aggregate statistics obscure. The city cannot fully benefit from statewide tailwinds if its dominant employers continue rationalizing capacity.

H-1B Visa Dynamics: Foreign Labor Amid Domestic Displacement

Iowa's H-1B certified petition data reveals a sophisticated labor market dynamic absent from WARN notice analysis. From 2,731 unique employers, Iowa processed 19,189 H-1B/LCA certified petitions with an 88.9 percent approval rate (6,346 approved, 792 denied). This represents substantial reliance on foreign temporary skilled workers.

Critically, Davenport-area employers do not prominently appear among Iowa's top H-1B filers. The University of Iowa (1,294 petitions, avg. salary $89,619) and Iowa State University (940 petitions, avg. salary $58,889) dominate, as do national IT staffing firms Tata Consultancy Services (513 petitions, avg. $64,926) and Yash Technologies (244 petitions, avg. $72,263). Rockwell Collins (687 petitions, avg. $88,417), headquartered in Cedar Rapids, represents the largest manufacturing-sector H-1B employer in Iowa.

The absence of John Deere from prominent H-1B filers is notable. The company's layoff pattern does not appear coupled with documented immigration-based worker substitution. This contrasts sharply with sectors like software development (top H-1B occupations include Computer Systems Analysts, Computer Programmers, and Software Developers, averaging $58,577-$109,768 annually) where foreign worker recruitment frequently accompanies domestic displacement.

However, the data suggests broader dynamics: Iowa's top H-1B occupations concentrate in technical fields where foreign worker recruitment continues despite manufacturing sector contraction. This reflects divergent fortunes—knowledge work sectors expanding while traditional manufacturing contracts, with H-1B recruitment responding to sector-level dynamics rather than substituting for specific displaced worker cohorts.

Structural Outlook and Resilience Factors

Davenport's WARN notice history reveals not temporary cyclical adjustment but structural economic transformation. Manufacturing's persistence as the largest displacement sector, combined with accelerating retail and wholesale contraction, indicates economic adjustment to long-term competitive pressures rather than demand fluctuations.

The city's resilience depends on whether emerging sectors can absorb displaced manufacturing workers or if the community experiences persistent underemployment and population loss. Healthcare expansion (currently 333 displaced workers across six notices, but historically a growth sector) offers partial offset. Iowa's tight overall labor market provides foundation for reemployment, yet sectoral wage differences mean displaced manufacturing workers may face permanent real income loss even if nominally reemployed.

John Deere's continued presence provides economic anchor, yet its serial workforce reductions suggest optimization rather than expansion. Without new manufacturing investment or significant service-sector growth poles, Davenport faces continued volatility around current employment equilibrium rather than recovery to historical baselines.

Latest Iowa Layoff Reports