WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, updated daily.
Workers affected by industry sector
Workers affected by notice type
| Company | City | Employees | Notice Date | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRST Expedited, Inc dba CRST The Transportation Solutions, Inc | Cedar Rapids | 30 | 2025-12-03 | Layoff |
| CRST Expedited, Inc d/b/a CRST The Transportation Solutions, Inc | Cedar Rapids | 30 | 2025-12-03 | Layoff |
| RELCO, a Wabtec Company | Cedar Rapids | 34 | 2025-11-11 | Closure |
| Raytheon Technologies | Cedar Rapids | 3 | 2025-11-04 | |
| Rtx | Cedar Rapids | 3 | 2025-11-04 | Layoff |
| BFHO, Inc | Cedar Rapids | 46 | 2025-10-28 | Closure |
| BHFO, Inc | Cedar Rapids | 46 | 2025-10-28 | Closure |
| Raytheon Technologies | Cedar Rapids | 2 | 2025-09-30 | |
| Rtx | Cedar Rapids | 2 | 2025-09-30 | Layoff |
| Burlington Trailways | Cedar Rapids | 5 | 2025-09-18 | Closure |
| Smurfit Westrock Company | Cedar Rapids | 100 | 2025-08-05 | Closure |
| Federal Express Corporation | Cedar Rapids | 57 | 2025-07-30 | Layoff |
| United States Cellular Corporation | Cedar Rapids | 30 | 2025-07-02 | |
| Collins Aerospace | Cedar Rapids | 102 | 2025-06-12 | Layoff |
| United States Cellular Corporation | Cedar Rapids | 183 | 2025-06-11 | |
| BFHO, Inc | Cedar Rapids | 32 | 2025-04-15 | Layoff |
| BHFO, Inc | Cedar Rapids | 32 | 2025-04-15 | Layoff |
| Rtx | Cedar Rapids | 4 | 2025-04-10 | Layoff |
| United States Cellular Corporation | Cedar Rapids | 183 | 2025-04-07 | Layoff |
| Collins Aerospace | Cedar Rapids | 160 | 2025-03-13 | Layoff |
# Cedar Rapids Layoff Landscape: A Comprehensive Economic Analysis
Cedar Rapids has experienced substantial workforce displacement over the past two decades, with 102 WARN (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification) notices affecting 6,648 workers since 2005. This represents a significant labor market disruption for a metropolitan area with a 2020 Census population of approximately 137,000. To contextualize this figure: the affected workers represent roughly 4.8 percent of the city's total population, and considerably more when measured against the local labor force, which stood at approximately 73,000 in recent years. This means that roughly 9 percent of Cedar Rapids's workforce has been subject to mass layoff events—a substantial proportion that reflects deep economic turbulence beneath the surface of the broader regional economy.
The distribution of these notices is highly uneven over time, with clustering around specific economic periods that correlates closely with national recessions and sector-specific disruptions. The data reveals not a steady-state problem but rather a pattern of acute shocks interspersed with periods of relative stability. Understanding Cedar Rapids's layoff pattern requires examining both the macro-economic forces driving national trends and the micro-economic factors specific to the city's dominant employers and industrial base.
The single largest source of layoffs in Cedar Rapids traces directly to Rockwell Collins and its successor entities, which collectively account for 17 notices and 562 affected workers—representing 8.5 percent of all WARN-listed job losses in the city over this 20-year period. Rockwell Collins, historically Cedar Rapids's largest private employer, established deep roots in the local economy dating back decades. The company's dominance in the aerospace and defense sectors created both prosperity and vulnerability for the region.
Rockwell Collins filed 12 separate WARN notices affecting 191 workers across the study period, while Collins Aerospace, which emerged following corporate restructuring and acquisitions, filed 6 notices affecting 371 workers. This distinction is critical: the consolidation of aerospace and defense contractors under larger corporate umbrellas has created significant redundancy in Cedar Rapids operations. Collins Aerospace, as a division of Raytheon Technologies (now RTX), represents the integration of once-independent Cedar Rapids operations into a massive defense conglomerate. This integration typically produces rationalization efforts—the elimination of duplicate functions, consolidation of headquarters functions, and the closure or downsizing of older facilities.
The aerospace and defense sector's volatility stems from its dependence on government procurement cycles, defense budgets, and periodic consolidation waves. The data suggests that Collins Aerospace and Rockwell Collins combined account for approximately 9.2 percent of documented WARN notices in Cedar Rapids, concentrating significant layoff risk in a single industry and employer ecosystem. This concentration creates pronounced economic vulnerability: when defense spending contracts or when the sector undergoes consolidation, Cedar Rapids experiences outsized impacts relative to more diversified regional economies.
Beyond aerospace, Cedar Rapids's manufacturing sector has experienced sustained pressure. Columbus McKinnon Corporation filed 5 notices affecting 301 workers, making it the third-largest source of layoffs by worker count. Terex and Terex USA, LLC combined for 5 notices affecting 275 workers. These manufacturers operate within supply chains vulnerable to multiple shocks: economic recessions reducing demand, automation replacing manual labor, and offshore competition suppressing wages and eroding market share for domestic producers.
Manufacturing accounts for 7 notices and 405 affected workers in the WARN data—representing 6.1 percent of notices but 6.1 percent of workers, indicating that manufacturing layoffs, while significant, involve smaller average cohorts than other sectors. This pattern reflects manufacturing's heterogeneous nature: some firms lay off dozens, others hundreds. The presence of multiple manufacturing WARN notices across different time periods suggests chronic rather than episodic stress within this sector.
The manufacturing story in Cedar Rapids is particularly notable because Iowa remains a significant manufacturing state despite decades of sectoral decline nationally. Cedar Rapids has competed reasonably well within this context, maintaining manufacturing operations that many Rust Belt communities lost entirely. However, the data indicates that this survival has come alongside persistent workforce reductions—the sector is not disappearing but is steadily reducing its footprint through automation, consolidation, and consolidation of operations.
The Finance and Insurance sector filed 8 notices affecting 603 workers—representing 7.8 percent of notices but 9.1 percent of affected workers, indicating that this sector produces larger-scale layoff events than average. Cedar Rapids, as a regional financial services center, hosts multiple significant financial institutions. Transamerica Life filed 5 notices affecting 227 workers, while Toyota Financial Services filed 2 notices affecting 376 workers—a striking figure indicating a massive single layoff event.
The finance and insurance sector's vulnerability reflects fundamental structural changes in the industry: the automation of routine financial transactions, the centralization of operations in major financial hubs, and the consolidation of the banking sector itself. Toyota Financial Services's massive 376-worker layoff suggests that a significant Cedar Rapids operation was either closed or radically downsized. This represents the sector's broader tendency to concentrate operations in fewer, larger facilities rather than maintain distributed regional networks.
Insurance and finance are historically recession-resistant sectors, yet Cedar Rapids's experience shows significant volatility. This divergence likely reflects the specific character of Cedar Rapids institutions: regional and mid-tier firms more vulnerable to consolidation and offshoring than the largest national players headquartered in New York or other major financial centers.
The historical distribution of WARN notices reveals striking patterns of clustering around specific economic events. The 2009-2010 period, corresponding to the Great Recession's deepest impact, produced 12 notices affecting thousands of workers. This clustering is precisely what economic theory predicts: recessions trigger cascading layoffs across sectors simultaneously.
However, the most dramatic recent pattern emerges in 2022 and 2025. The year 2022 produced 13 notices—the highest annual total in the dataset—while 2025 shows 20 notices, a figure that dwarfs any previous annual total. This dramatic escalation demands careful interpretation. The 2025 data may reflect incomplete reporting (early-year WARN filings that will continue accumulating) or may represent a genuine economic inflection point for Cedar Rapids. Alternatively, it could reflect changes in WARN filing practices or increased compliance after regulatory emphasis.
The intermediate years—2011 through 2019—show relatively moderate notice counts (between 1 and 8 annually), suggesting periods of greater labor market stability punctuated by specific company-level disruptions rather than broad-based layoff waves. The years 2020 and 2021 produced 7 and 4 notices respectively, a relatively modest response for a period encompassing the COVID-19 pandemic's economic disruptions, potentially reflecting the temporary nature of pandemic-related shutdowns and government support programs.
The Information and Technology sector filed 6 notices affecting 435 workers—representing 5.9 percent of notices but 6.5 percent of affected workers. United States Cellular Corporation alone filed 3 notices affecting 396 workers, indicating a major presence in Cedar Rapids with significant vulnerability to consolidation in the increasingly concentrated telecommunications industry.
The telecommunications sector's instability reflects industry consolidation and the maturation of the cellular market. United States Cellular Corporation, as a regional player in an industry dominated by three national giants, faces perpetual pressure to rationalize operations and consolidate back-office functions. The 396-worker layoff from this single employer represents a seismic shock for a mid-sized city—essentially the elimination of a small manufacturing plant's worth of workers from a single company in a single event.
The direct impact of 6,648 workers losing jobs through WARN-covered layoffs represents only the initial shock. Economists typically estimate income multipliers of 1.5 to 2.5, meaning that every dollar of lost wages ripples through local economies, reducing demand for retail goods, services, housing, and municipal tax revenues. A conservative estimate suggests that these layoffs reduced local purchasing power by $200 to $400 million over the 20-year study period—a figure that dwarfs Cedar Rapids's annual city budget.
These aggregate figures mask the human and social reality: individual workers losing stable employment, families facing housing insecurity, skill-dependent workers discovering their expertise no longer commands market value, and younger workers facing permanent wage scarring from mid-career job loss. For Cedar Rapids specifically, the concentration of aerospace and defense employment means that cyclical sectors create feast-or-famine economic conditions that complicate household financial planning and reduce the stability of the local labor market.
Cedar Rapids's resilience reflects several factors: the city's diversified employer base preventing total economic collapse from any single sector's decline, the presence of multiple healthcare institutions providing stable employment, and the broader agricultural processing and equipment manufacturing base that provides counterbalance to aerospace volatility. However, the persistent layoff activity across two decades indicates that this resilience is not sufficient to prevent substantial workforce displacement.
Cedar Rapids's experience reflects broader Iowa trends while maintaining distinct characteristics rooted in its specific employer base. Iowa's economy remains dominated by agriculture, food processing, and manufacturing—sectors all vulnerable to automation, trade disruption, and consolidation. Cedar Rapids's presence as the state's second-largest city creates a concentration of white-collar finance and insurance jobs absent in most other Iowa communities, simultaneously making the local economy more diversified and more vulnerable to sector-specific shocks.
The state-wide Iowa unemployment rate has typically tracked near the national average, masking significant regional variation. Cedar Rapids's reliance on a handful of large employers creates volatility around state-wide averages. The Linn County labor market (encompassing Cedar Rapids) experiences larger swings than the state aggregate would suggest, with WARN-triggered layoffs concentrating impact in specific geographic areas and occupational categories.
The transportation sector's 4 notices affecting 492 workers reflects Cedar Rapids's position as a regional transportation and logistics hub. This sector's employment tends toward lower-wage work more vulnerable to automation and offshoring. The presence of substantial transportation layoffs alongside declining retail employment (3 notices, 84 workers) indicates weakness in consumer-facing and distribution-oriented employment—precisely the kinds of jobs that typically provide entry points for workers without advanced credentials.
The data from 2025 onward requires careful monitoring. If the emerging pattern indicates genuine economic deterioration—whether from recession, sector-specific disruption, or other causes—Cedar Rapids may face significantly harder labor market conditions than the preceding decade. The absence of major notice clusters in the 2011-2019 recovery period suggests that the local economy had achieved some stability; any reversal would represent material deterioration for workers and families dependent on local employment.
Get Cedar Rapids Layoff Alerts
Free daily alerts for WARN Act filings in Iowa.