WARN Act Layoffs in Goodyear, Arizona
WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in Goodyear, Arizona, updated daily.
Data Insights
Industry Breakdown
Workers affected by industry sector
Recent WARN Notices in Goodyear
| Company | City | Employees | Notice Date | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meyer Burger Americas | Goodyear | 72 | ||
| Manpower Group US Inc. DBA HelloFresh | Goodyear | 564 | ||
| ABM Industry Group | Goodyear | 87 | ||
| UPS Supply Chain Solutions | Goodyear | 98 | ||
| Sub-Zero Group | Goodyear | 446 | ||
| Systems Solutions of Kentucky | Goodyear | 39 | ||
| Bashas' Family Stores | Goodyear | 77 |
Analysis: Layoffs in Goodyear, Arizona
# Goodyear Layoff Analysis: Scale, Sectors, and Economic Implications
Overview: A Concentrated but Episodic Disruption
Goodyear, Arizona, has experienced 1,383 layoffs across seven WARN notices spanning the past sixteen years, establishing the city as a meaningful but not dominant layoff hotspot within Arizona's labor market. The data reveals a strikingly episodic pattern rather than steady deterioration. With notices filed in 2009, 2019, 2020, 2023, and 2024, and two additional notices in 2025, Goodyear's layoff activity clusters around economic inflection points—the post-2008 recession recovery, pandemic-era adjustments, and the more recent 2023–2025 period of corporate restructuring. The scale of impact—1,383 workers from a city with substantial but not overwhelming employment base—suggests that when Goodyear is affected by layoffs, the disruptions are concentrated in specific employers rather than diffused across the local economy.
The concentration of layoff activity is extreme: the top two employers, Manpower Group US Inc. DBA HelloFresh and Sub-Zero Group, account for 1,010 of the 1,383 affected workers, representing 73 percent of all layoffs. This dependency on a handful of large employers creates vulnerability to individual corporate decisions rather than reflecting broad-based economic decline. The remaining five notices distributed across UPS Supply Chain Solutions, ABM Industry Group, Bashas' Family Stores, Meyer Burger Americas, and Systems Solutions of Kentucky each affect fewer than 100 workers, indicating a long tail of modest workforce reductions that have collectively accumulated over the sixteen-year observation period.
Dominant Employers: Two Companies Shape Goodyear's Layoff Profile
HelloFresh's single 2024 or 2025 notice affecting 564 workers represents the largest discrete layoff event in Goodyear's recent history and illuminates the city's role as a logistics and fulfillment hub. HelloFresh's meal-kit delivery business expanded aggressively during the pandemic when at-home consumption surged, necessitating substantial fulfillment infrastructure. The 564-worker reduction suggests contraction in response to normalized post-pandemic consumer behavior and intensifying competition in the direct-to-consumer food sector. This layoff reflects not local economic weakness but rather the volatile nature of e-commerce and subscription food services, sectors sensitive to consumer discretionary spending and venture capital appetite.
Sub-Zero Group's 446-worker WARN notice, equally consequential, points toward distinct challenges in premium appliance manufacturing. Sub-Zero, headquartered in Wisconsin and operating manufacturing and distribution facilities across multiple states, likely consolidated or downsized Goodyear operations as part of broader restructuring efforts. The timing of this notice—appearing in the recent 2025 cohort—coincides with broader headwinds in housing construction and home appliance demand that intensified through 2024 and into 2025. Premium appliance manufacturers face particular vulnerability when new home construction contracts and household formation slow, as occurred in the higher-interest-rate environment that persisted through 2024 and 2025.
Together, these two employers generated a layoff event exceeding 1,000 workers concentrated in logistics/fulfillment and manufacturing—sectors that often cycle sharply in response to consumer demand and capital investment decisions rather than indicating deep local economic structural problems. The absence of large layoffs in business services, healthcare, or professional services suggests that Goodyear's employment base in recession-resistant sectors may be more stable than its cyclical sectors.
Industry Patterns: Manufacturing and Logistics Vulnerability
The industry breakdown reveals a pronounced concentration in goods movement and production rather than diversified service sectors. Manufacturing accounts for two notices and 518 workers; Information and Technology accounts for two notices and 126 workers; while Utilities, Transportation, and Retail each appear once. The classification of HelloFresh under Utilities (564 workers) reflects the data taxonomy challenge when meal-kit operations occupy industrial fulfillment facilities similar to traditional utility distribution infrastructure. More analytically, the dominant story is that Goodyear's exposed sectors are Manufacturing (372 workers excluding the Utilities-classified HelloFresh) and Logistics/Transportation (98 workers), with ancillary presence in IT services and retail.
Manufacturing's prominence reflects Sub-Zero's presence but also Meyer Burger Americas' 72-worker reduction, a notice suggesting contraction in solar photovoltaic manufacturing—a sector that expanded sharply with renewable energy investment incentives but faces cyclical demand tied to electricity prices, policy subsidies, and global competition. The IT sector's relatively modest footprint (126 workers across two notices) indicates that despite Arizona's tech corridor development in Phoenix and surrounding areas, Goodyear has not emerged as a significant tech employment hub, limiting exposure to the sector-wide consolidations and headcount optimization that characterize technology firms.
The concentration in goods production and movement makes Goodyear's labor market particularly sensitive to supply chain dynamics, consumer discretionary spending, and capital goods cycles. When logistics volumes contract or manufacturing output declines, Goodyear workers face disproportionate risk compared to metro areas with larger concentrations of government employment, healthcare, or professional services.
Historical Trends: Clustering Around Inflection Points
Goodyear's layoff history exhibits temporal clustering rather than linear escalation or decline. The single 2009 notice appeared as the post-2008 recession recovery was beginning to take shape. The absence of notices from 2010 through 2018 suggests that Goodyear's economy largely weathered the recovery period without major employer reductions. The isolated 2019 notice appeared as the expansion cycle matured. The 2020 notice coincided with pandemic-era disruptions and demand shifts, though the scale (not disclosed in this excerpt) warrants comparison to national layoff surges.
The concentration of activity from 2023 onward—one notice in 2023, one in 2024, and two in 2025—signals a new era of restructuring. This timing aligns with the post-pandemic normalization of consumer behavior, significant interest rate increases that dampened housing and appliance demand, and broader corporate cost-cutting initiatives that accelerated through 2024 and into 2025. The Federal Reserve's rate-hiking cycle, which began in March 2022 and continued through mid-2023, created persistent headwinds for cyclical industries that become visible in layoff notices with a lag of 12 to 18 months as companies adjust capacity.
The upward trend in 2024–2025 does not yet constitute a durable reversal, but the trajectory warrants monitoring. If notices continue to accumulate through 2025 and into 2026, Goodyear may be entering a more sustained period of workforce reduction tied to secular shifts in manufacturing, logistics optimization, or appliance demand.
Local Economic Impact: Concentration Risk and Community Vulnerability
For Goodyear specifically, the concentration of layoffs in two employers creates asymmetric risk. The 1,010 workers affected by HelloFresh and Sub-Zero represent a meaningful share of the city's total employment, though exact impact depends on Goodyear's overall labor force size. Both layoff events likely cascade beyond direct workers: HelloFresh's 564-worker reduction implies lost local spending on housing, food, and services; Sub-Zero's 446 workers affects appliance manufacturing supply chains and related services.
The sectors involved—perishable food fulfillment and premium appliance manufacturing—offer limited opportunities for workers to transition horizontally into other Goodyear employers. Fulfillment center workers typically require retraining to shift into manufacturing, healthcare, or technical roles. Appliance manufacturing workers similarly face transition friction unless other assembly or technical manufacturing operations exist in Goodyear. This specificity of skills and employer dependency means that affected workers likely either commute to other Arizona metros (Phoenix proper, Chandler, Tempe) or face extended unemployment and retraining.
The 77-worker reduction at Bashas' Family Stores, a regional grocery chain, is particularly sensitive in this context because grocery and retail workforce reductions typically affect lower-wage workers with fewer transition pathways. Retail workers displaced from Bashas' face particular difficulty if Goodyear's local retail sector is contracting or consolidating.
Regional Context: Goodyear Within Arizona's Broader Labor Dynamics
Arizona's official labor market data provides crucial context. The state's insured unemployment rate stands at 0.56 percent as of April 2026, far below the national insured rate of 1.25 percent, indicating that Arizona's labor market remains relatively tight despite recent layoff activity. However, Arizona's initial jobless claims jumped from 2,523 four weeks prior to 4,018 in the week ending April 4, 2026—a 59.3 percent surge in the four-week trend and a 105.3 percent increase year-over-year from 1,957. This pattern suggests that layoff activity is accelerating in Arizona despite the low unemployment rate, indicating that job losses are occurring even as the overall employment level remains elevated.
Goodyear's seven WARN notices over sixteen years place it as a secondary layoff location relative to Phoenix and surrounding metropolitan areas. However, Arizona's total job openings stand at 122,000 as of the latest JOLTS report, providing some offsetting opportunity for displaced workers who can access the broader Phoenix metro labor market. The state's unemployment rate of 4.5 percent in January 2026 (data timing) remains moderate by historical standards, though rising claims suggest deterioration is occurring.
The national JOLTS data for February 2026 show 1,721,000 layoffs and discharges nationwide against 4,849,000 hires, indicating that despite elevated layoff activity, job creation remains substantially above separation, maintaining net positive employment growth. Goodyear's layoffs thus occur within a context of overall Arizona labor market tightness, though that tightness is eroding as initial claims accelerate.
The Absence of H-1B Displacement Evidence
Arizona's substantial H-1B visa petition activity—55,865 certified petitions from 6,895 unique employers—does not reveal direct evidence of H-1B workers replacing domestic workers at Goodyear-based employers within the WARN notice data. None of the top H-1B employers (Infosys Limited, Tata Consultancy Services, American Express, and others) appear in Goodyear's WARN notices. Systems Solutions of Kentucky, which filed a WARN notice for 39 workers, does not appear in the H-1B petition dataset provided, suggesting no large-scale H-1B petition activity.
This absence is not exculpatory—the data does not permit identification of individual employer H-1B activity beyond the named top filers—but it does indicate that the most prominent H-1B employers in Arizona are not simultaneously laying off domestic workers in Goodyear. The layoffs appear driven by demand contraction (HelloFresh, Sub-Zero) and sector consolidation (Meyer Burger, Bashas') rather than replacement of domestic with foreign workers on temporary visas. However, the data limitation means this conclusion requires qualification: smaller employers in Goodyear could be engaging in H-1B hiring while laying off domestically without appearing in the aggregated petition data.
Goodyear's layoff landscape reflects cyclical sensitivity in logistics and manufacturing rather than structural economic decline or evidence of large-scale displacement by H-1B visa holders. The concentration in two major employers creates community vulnerability, while the recent acceleration of layoffs from 2023 onward suggests economic headwinds are intensifying. Arizona's still-tight labor market provides displaced workers eventual reemployment opportunities, but the specificity of skills in fulfillment and appliance manufacturing means transition friction will affect individual workers significantly even as overall state employment remains resilient.
Get Goodyear Layoff Alerts
Free daily alerts for WARN Act filings in Arizona.
Companies in Goodyear
Latest Arizona Layoff Reports
Other Cities in Arizona
Top Industries
County
Metro Area
For Funds & Analysts
Nicholas at Standard Investments ran 3,277 API calls in 14 days. Annual contracts, bulk exports, webhooks, custom research.