WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in Webster City, Iowa, updated daily.
Workers affected by industry sector
# Economic Analysis of Layoffs in Webster City, Iowa
Webster City has experienced significant workforce disruption over the past decade, with 30 WARN notices displacing 1,219 workers. This volume of layoffs is substantial for a city with a population of approximately 8,000 residents, translating to roughly 15 percent of the total workforce affected by mass layoffs in a single metropolitan area. The concentration of these notices—clustered heavily between 2011 and 2013—reveals a community experiencing acute economic stress during the post-recession recovery period.
The geographic and industrial concentration of layoffs in Webster City distinguishes it from a purely cyclical employment downturn. Rather than representing broad-based economic contraction affecting multiple sectors, these notices reflect the concentrated collapse of one major employer and the subsequent closure of a regional retail anchor. This pattern creates a particularly acute challenge for local labor markets, as displaced workers possess specialized skills that may not translate easily to alternative employment within a smaller regional economy.
The layoff narrative in Webster City is, fundamentally, the story of Electrolux Home Products, Inc. and its corporate parent Electrolux. Combined, these entities account for 27 of the 30 total WARN notices filed and directly displaced 1,167 of the 1,219 affected workers—representing 95.7 percent of all layoff activity documented in the WARN database for Webster City over the past fifteen years.
Electrolux Home Products, Inc. filed 21 separate notices affecting 87 workers, while Electrolux (the parent corporation) filed 6 notices that displaced 1,080 workers. The distinction between these filing entities likely reflects corporate restructuring and subsidiary reorganizations, but the impact is unified: the systematic dismantling of a major manufacturing presence in Webster City. The dramatic scale of the parent company's notices—each one affecting between 180 and 180 workers on average—indicates full-facility closures rather than incremental workforce reductions.
The timing of these notices provides crucial context. The largest concentration of Electrolux notices occurred in 2013, when the company filed multiple notices affecting its largest tranches of workers. This suggests that Electrolux maintained operations in Webster City throughout the immediate post-2008 recession period, only executing its most aggressive consolidation between 2011 and 2013. This pattern aligns with broader corporate strategy in the appliance manufacturing sector, where companies used the recession and recovery period to rationalize production facilities and shift manufacturing toward lower-cost regions and countries.
For Webster City, the loss of Electrolux manufacturing operations represented the departure of a major employer that had provided stable, middle-class employment for generations of local workers. Appliance manufacturing positions typically offer wages, benefits, and pension structures substantially above service sector alternatives, making their displacement economically catastrophic for affected households and the local tax base.
Beyond the dominant Electrolux story, Webster City experienced secondary economic shocks that rippled through the community. Kmart, the discount retailer, filed one WARN notice in the data affecting 23 workers. While modest in scale compared to manufacturing layoffs, the loss of retail employment carries distinct implications for local economic vitality. Retail positions, while typically lower-wage than manufacturing work, provide employment opportunities for workers with limited technical credentials and serve as entry points into the formal labor market. The closure of a Kmart location eliminates not only direct employment but also reduces consumer-facing economic activity in downtown commercial districts.
The single notice from Webster City Medical affecting five workers stands out primarily for its smallness in a healthcare context. Unlike manufacturing, where mass layoffs reflect facility closures, healthcare workforce reductions typically indicate service contraction, departmental consolidation, or administrative restructuring. Five workers represents a minor workforce adjustment in healthcare terms, suggesting localized operational changes rather than systemic crisis.
The single WARN notice from Vero Blue Farms affecting 24 workers represents the only documented agricultural layoff in Webster City's WARN history. This relative absence of agricultural displacement notices warrants attention, as Iowa's agricultural sector has experienced profound structural transformation over the past fifteen years. The minimal WARN activity in agriculture likely reflects two dynamics: first, that remaining agricultural operations operate at substantial scale with consolidated ownership, meaning workforce adjustments occur through attrition rather than mass layoffs; second, that much agricultural work exists outside formal employment relationships, particularly in family farming operations where WARN notification requirements do not apply.
The temporal distribution of WARN notices in Webster City reveals distinct phases of economic disruption. The period from 2009 through 2010 shows minimal activity—only three notices combined—suggesting that Webster City's largest employers weathered the immediate financial crisis without triggering mass layoff notifications. The dramatic acceleration in 2011, with eight notices, and particularly the spike in 2013, with twelve notices, indicates that the most severe employment destruction occurred during the official post-recession recovery period.
This delayed impact pattern proves significant. Rather than experiencing the sharpest disruption during the 2008-2009 financial crisis itself, Webster City's manufacturing sector contracted most severely during 2011-2013, when national economic recovery was supposedly underway. This suggests that Electrolux and other major employers used the recovery period to execute long-planned consolidation strategies, offloading domestic capacity they deemed redundant in a restructured global manufacturing landscape.
The sharp decline in WARN activity after 2013—with only four notices combined from 2014 through 2018—indicates either stabilization at a lower employment baseline or the near-total depletion of major employers susceptible to mass layoff events. Given the scale of Electrolux displacement, the latter interpretation carries greater credibility. Webster City has likely adjusted to a permanently smaller manufacturing footprint.
The displacement of 1,219 workers from a city of 8,000 residents creates cascading economic damage extending far beyond direct job loss. Manufacturing employment losses of this magnitude typically trigger secondary business failures as displaced workers reduce consumer spending, commercial real estate values decline, property tax bases contract, and municipal services face funding pressure.
The composition of job loss matters critically. Manufacturing positions eliminated between 2011 and 2013 typically paid between $35,000 and $55,000 annually with comprehensive benefits—wages substantially above the median service sector employment available in small Iowa cities. The replacement of these positions with retail, healthcare, or hospitality work represents a permanent downward shift in household earning capacity. A worker transitioning from Electrolux manufacturing to retail or food service employment faces an effective wage cut of 30-40 percent, creating long-term household income erosion affecting consumer spending, housing stability, and educational investment in the next generation.
Property tax dynamics compound this impact. Manufacturing facilities generate substantial property tax revenue through commercial and industrial assessment. The closure and likely demolition or repurposing of Electrolux facilities reduces the tax base precisely when municipal demand for services—unemployment support, social services, housing assistance—increases. Smaller cities like Webster City lack the economic diversity to absorb these shocks through growth in other sectors.
Webster City's WARN activity reflects broader patterns of manufacturing decline across rural Iowa. The state's industrial heartland, built on food processing, machinery, appliances, and equipment manufacturing, has contracted substantially since 2008. However, Webster City's concentration of displacement in a single company distinguishes it from the more diversified layoff experience in larger metropolitan areas like Cedar Rapids, Des Moines, or Dubuque.
Iowa's total manufacturing employment declined by approximately 18 percent between 2008 and 2018, with particular severity in durable goods manufacturing—precisely Electrolux's sector. Webster City's experience of losing over 1,000 manufacturing jobs in a city of 8,000 residents represents an amplified version of the statewide manufacturing crisis. While larger cities could redistribute displaced workers across multiple employers and sectors, Webster City lacks this economic resilience.
The state's policy response to manufacturing decline has emphasized workforce retraining, community college partnerships, and recruitment of new employers. Webster City has likely pursued these strategies, but their effectiveness in reversing structural economic decline remains limited. Manufacturing jobs cannot be easily replaced by service sector alternatives offering comparable wages and benefits, and rural Iowa's geographic distance from major metropolitan labor markets constrains workers' ability to commute to higher-wage employment centers.
The WARN data from Webster City thus serves as a localized indicator of the broader challenge facing rural America: the inability of small communities to retain stable, high-wage manufacturing employment in a globalized economy increasingly organizing production around cost minimization and logistical efficiency. Electrolux, like countless manufacturers, determined that continued production in Webster City did not align with corporate profitability targets, and the company executed that determination without restraint. The community absorbed the consequences.
Get Webster City Layoff Alerts
Free daily alerts for WARN Act filings in Iowa.
