WARN Act Layoffs in Vance, Alabama

WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in Vance, Alabama, updated daily.

6
Notices (All Time)
990
Workers Affected
Syncreon
Biggest Filing (312)
Transportation
Top Industry

Data Insights

Industry Breakdown

Workers affected by industry sector

Layoff Types

Workers affected by notice type

Recent WARN Notices in Vance

CompanyCityEmployeesNotice DateType
Averitt Express IncVance1932025-10-23Layoff
Logistics Insight CorpVance1222023-03-29Layoff
Borgers USAVance2712018-10-03Closure
T W Fitting N.A., LLCVance582015-03-23Closure
SyncreonVance3122012-01-06Closure
Caterpillar Logistics, IncVance342010-11-01Layoff

Analysis: Layoffs in Vance, Alabama

# Economic Analysis of Layoffs in Vance, Alabama

Overview: Scale and Significance of Workforce Displacement

Vance, Alabama has experienced a concentrated pattern of workforce disruption centered around six WARN Act filings that collectively affected 990 workers over a fifteen-year span. While six notices may appear modest in absolute terms, the concentration of these layoffs among a small number of major employers and the sheer volume of workers impacted—nearly 1,000 individuals—signals significant economic stress for a community of Vance's size. The data reveals an episodic rather than continuous pattern of displacement, with layoffs occurring in 2010, 2012, 2015, 2018, 2023, and 2025. This temporal distribution suggests that Vance's workforce challenges stem not from gradual industrial decline but from discrete, shock-like employment disruptions tied to specific corporate decisions, facility consolidations, or market contractions among major regional employers.

The 990 workers affected represents a substantial portion of any small Alabama municipality's labor force. To contextualize this figure, a single large employer filing a WARN notice affects the entire community—not just individual workers and their families, but also local retailers, service providers, municipal tax revenues, and school enrollment. When six such events unfold across fifteen years, the cumulative psychological and fiscal impact on community institutions becomes significant, even if the notices do not occur simultaneously.

Dominant Employers and Logistics Sector Concentration

The layoff landscape in Vance is dominated by logistics and supply chain companies, with Syncreon leading in absolute numbers. Syncreon's single WARN notice affected 312 workers, representing nearly one-third of all displaced workers in the dataset. This is followed closely by Borgers USA, which filed one notice affecting 271 workers—approximately 27 percent of the total. Together, these two companies account for 583 workers, or 59 percent of all WARN-notice-related job losses in Vance.

Averitt Express Inc contributed an additional 193 workers through one notice, representing 19 percent of the total displacement. Three additional employers—Logistics Insight Corp, T W Fitting N.A., LLC, and Caterpillar Logistics, Inc—filed notices affecting 122, 58, and 34 workers respectively. The concentration among these six firms, particularly the dominance of Syncreon and Borgers USA, reveals a community economic structure heavily dependent on a narrow base of logistics and transportation-adjacent employers.

The nature of these companies is instructive. Syncreon and Caterpillar Logistics, Inc are third-party logistics providers serving multinational supply chains. Borgers USA operates in automotive component manufacturing and distribution. Averitt Express Inc is a regional trucking and logistics company. Logistics Insight Corp specializes in supply chain services. These are not traditional manufacturers maintaining long-term community roots but rather capital-efficient logistics operators sensitive to supply chain reconfiguration, automation, and corporate consolidation decisions made at distant headquarters.

The vulnerability inherent in this employment structure is apparent: when a logistics company decides to consolidate distribution centers, automate warehouse operations, or relocate functions to reduce costs, entire facilities can be shuttered with relatively little community consultation. Unlike legacy manufacturers with deep ties to local communities and regional supply chains, modern logistics firms operate with geographic flexibility and minimal switching costs when relocating operations to cheaper labor markets or more strategically positioned distribution hubs.

Industry Patterns and Structural Forces

The transportation sector explicitly accounts for only 156 workers across two notices, yet this figure understates the true transport and logistics orientation of Vance's layoffs. When industry classification is examined holistically, the logistics, warehousing, and transportation ecosystem dominates. Syncreon, Borgers USA, Averitt Express Inc, Logistics Insight Corp, and Caterpillar Logistics, Inc are all fundamentally logistics or transportation-adjacent operations. Only T W Fitting N.A., LLC, a metal fabrication and fitting manufacturer, represents a departure from this pattern, though even this company likely serves supply chain clients.

This sectoral concentration reflects Vance's role within Alabama's broader logistics infrastructure corridor. The state's strategic position between major southeastern metropolitan areas, combined with Interstate 20/59 corridor proximity and regional rail access, has attracted significant logistics investment. However, this specialization creates structural vulnerability. The logistics sector has undergone dramatic transformation through warehouse automation, robotic process automation, autonomous vehicle development, and algorithmic supply chain optimization. Companies operating in this space face relentless pressure to reduce headcount, and they possess the geographic flexibility to pursue such reductions by consolidating or relocating operations rather than absorbing efficiency gains across existing facilities.

Additionally, the logistics sector is highly cyclical, sensitive to macroeconomic shocks, consumer spending patterns, and supply chain disruptions. The 2023 and 2025 notices may reflect post-pandemic supply chain normalization, during which the artificial demand surge for warehouse capacity and logistics workers that characterized 2020-2022 evaporated as inventory levels normalized and e-commerce growth decelerated from pandemic-era trajectories.

Historical Layoff Trends: Episodic Rather Than Structural Decline

The temporal distribution of Vance's WARN notices reveals an episodic pattern rather than accelerating decline. Notices were filed in 2010, 2012, 2015, 2018, 2023, and 2025—spanning fifteen years with no clustering that would suggest cumulative industrial deterioration. The five-year gaps between several notices indicate that Vance's labor market experienced recovery windows between shocks rather than continuous contraction.

However, the recency of the 2023 and 2025 notices is noteworthy. These two filings account for 370 combined workers (assuming the 2025 notice references a recent or imminent layoff), suggesting that Vance's layoff challenges may be accelerating or entering a new phase. If these recent notices signal renewed workforce disruption after the relative stability of 2019-2022, this could indicate that post-pandemic supply chain normalization is proving more damaging to Vance's logistics employers than anticipated, or that competitive pressures and automation are finally reaching wage and employment reduction thresholds that trigger large-scale layoffs.

The 2010 and 2012 notices occurred during the post-financial-crisis recovery period, when logistics employers faced reduced shipping volumes and inventory demand. The 2015 notice likely reflects mid-cycle consolidation. The 2018 notice coincided with supply chain volatility from trade tensions and automation acceleration. The clustering of notices in 2023 and 2025 requires closer investigation to determine whether these represent discrete corporate decisions or a systemic shift in industry conditions.

Local Economic Impact: Tax Base, Labor Market, and Community Institutions

The loss of 990 workers across six WARN events carries substantial implications for Vance's municipal fiscal capacity and local labor market health. Each displaced worker represents lost income tax revenue, reduced sales tax activity (as household consumption declines), diminished property tax base vulnerability, and reduced demand for local services. For a small Alabama city, the loss of even 150-300 workers through a single employer closure creates cascading economic effects: reduced enrollment in local schools, decreased demand at retail establishments, increased municipal burden for social services, and degraded municipal credit ratings that raise borrowing costs.

Beyond immediate fiscal effects, repeated layoffs fragment community trust and degrade long-term economic development prospects. Workforce stability is essential for attracting new employers and retaining existing talent. When workers experience repeated displacement, they typically exit the local labor market entirely—either relocating to larger metropolitan areas with more diverse employment opportunities or withdrawing from the labor force altogether. The psychological toll of repeated disruption makes communities less attractive to young professionals and families considering relocation.

The 990 affected workers represent not merely statistical data points but hundreds of households experiencing income disruption, benefit termination, forced relocations, and disrupted children's education. In communities already experiencing economic stress, layoffs of this magnitude correlate with increases in domestic instability, substance abuse, mental health crises, and long-term unemployment that can span years even after reemployment occurs.

Regional Context and Comparative Position

Vance's layoff experience reflects broader patterns affecting Alabama's logistics and supply chain sectors. Alabama has positioned itself as a logistics and automotive hub within the southeastern supply chain network, attracting significant investment from third-party logistics providers and automotive component manufacturers. However, this specialization creates vulnerability similar to Vance's experience. When logistics providers consolidate operations or automate functions, entire regional clusters can experience simultaneous workforce disruption.

Vance's experience is consistent with broader trends affecting small Alabama industrial communities that depend on a narrow employer base rather than diversified local economies. Unlike larger metropolitan areas like Birmingham, Montgomery, or Huntsville—which have developed relatively diversified economic bases spanning healthcare, technology, government, and advanced manufacturing—smaller industrial communities remain vulnerable to the employment decisions of one or two dominant employers.

The 990 workers affected in Vance over fifteen years represents a concentration of disruption that would be notable in any community. For a small Alabama city, this represents a significant and repeated employment crisis that has likely prompted out-migration, eroded the tax base, and created intergenerational economic disadvantage for affected workers and their families. The most recent notices from 2023 and 2025 suggest that Vance's layoff challenges are not historical artifacts but ongoing contemporary workforce challenges requiring proactive economic development intervention and worker transition support.

Get Vance Layoff Alerts

Free daily alerts for WARN Act filings in Alabama.

FAQ

Are there layoffs in Vance, Alabama?
WARN Firehose tracks all WARN Act layoff notices filed in Vance, Alabama. We currently have 6 notices on file. Data is updated daily from official state sources.
How do I get notified about layoffs in Vance?
Subscribe using the form above to receive free daily email alerts whenever new WARN Act notices are filed in Alabama.
What is the WARN Act?
The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act requires employers with 100+ employees to provide 60 days' advance notice of mass layoffs and plant closings.