WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in East Chicago, Indiana, updated daily.
Workers affected by industry sector
Workers affected by notice type
# East Chicago's Layoff Crisis: A Decade of Manufacturing Decline and Sectoral Vulnerability
East Chicago has filed 17 WARN notices affecting 3,139 workers over the period captured in this data—a figure that understates the true disruption when contextualized against the city's modest population and workforce base. The sheer concentration of job losses among relatively few employers reveals a city whose economic fate is tethered to decisions made by multinational corporations with little stake in local stability.
The distribution of these notices tells an important story: while 17 notices might seem manageable in isolation, five notices resulted in zero workers actually separated (revised notices that reduced initial projections), meaning the real number of active layoff events was 12. These 12 events displaced approximately 3,139 workers, which represents a substantial shock to a community where manufacturing employment has been declining for decades. The median layoff affected 149 workers, but this figure masks extreme concentration—a small number of massive reductions by steel producers account for the majority of total displacements.
The data unmistakably points to a single sector and a small cluster of employers that have shaped East Chicago's economic trajectory. ArcelorMittal, through its various corporate entities, filed notices affecting approximately 1,891 workers across four distinct WARN submissions. When consolidated, ArcelorMittal USA dba ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor alone accounted for 877 workers in a single notice, making it the single largest layoff event in this dataset.
United States Steel Corporation and its related entity U.S. Steel Corporation filed separate notices (likely capturing the same event through duplicate filings or corporate restructuring) affecting 314 workers each. Harsco Metals, a secondary processor that depends on steel mill operations, filed two notices displacing 149 workers total. Combined, these three steel-related employers account for roughly 2,354 workers, or 75 percent of all layoffs documented in this dataset.
This concentration reflects East Chicago's historic position as a steel production hub anchored by massive integrated mills. The ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor facility represents one of the largest steel mills in North America, and fluctuations in global steel demand translate directly into workforce reductions in East Chicago. The multiple notices from ArcelorMittal, including revised versions reducing worker counts, suggest management recalibrating layoff projections as economic conditions shifted—a pattern typical during cyclical downturns when companies initially overestimate required headcount reductions.
The presence of Harsco Metals in the layoff data is particularly telling, as it demonstrates how steel industry distress ripples through supply chains. Secondary processors like Harsco depend on consistent mill throughput and rely on contracts with integrated producers. When mills reduce production, auxiliary services suffer compounding effects.
Beyond steel, Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago represents the city's second-largest employer by layoff volume, with 274 workers affected. Unlike the steel sector, which experienced secular decline and cyclical pressure, the casino's layoffs appear concentrated in 2020 based on the revised notices dated July and September of that year—a temporal marker pointing to COVID-19 pandemic disruptions. Initial WARN notices may have projected larger separations, but revised notices filed months later reduced the actual worker count to zero, suggesting either rehiring, reduction in scope, or reclassification of employment arrangements.
The hospitality sector accounted for 274 workers across three notices, representing 8.7 percent of total layoffs. This sector's appearance in layoff data is less about structural decline and more about cyclical shock—casinos depend on customer traffic and discretionary spending, both of which contracted sharply during pandemic-related shutdowns.
Manufacturing accounts for 628 workers across three notices, representing 20 percent of the dataset by worker count but understating its economic significance. This figure is misleading because it excludes the steel industry's actual employment impact. The data classifies steel industry employers separately, but they are fundamentally manufacturing operations. When steel is properly classified as manufacturing, the sector accounts for approximately 2,982 workers, or 95 percent of all layoffs.
This concentration in manufacturing—particularly heavy manufacturing—reveals an economy built on commodity production in an era of global oversupply, automated production, and shifting demand patterns. East Chicago's economic model depends on converting iron ore and raw materials into finished steel products for automotive, construction, and appliance manufacturers. Over the past two decades, this model has faced relentless pressure: automation has reduced headcount requirements per ton of output; foreign competition, particularly from lower-cost producers in India, Turkey, and Vietnam, has compressed margins; and the shift toward electric vehicles threatens to reduce steel demand from the automotive sector, historically a crucial customer for specialty steels.
The manufacturing sector's contribution to local tax revenue, property values, and retail spending makes these 628 documented workers representative of losses affecting thousands in indirect employment. When a steelworker earning $60,000 annually loses employment, retailers, restaurants, utilities, and local governments feel secondary effects immediately.
Examining the temporal distribution of WARN notices reveals critical patterns. The single notice filed in 2008 preceded the full employment devastation of the 2008-2009 financial crisis by several months. The three notices filed in 2009 likely represent the delayed effects of the automotive industry's near-collapse, which devastated steel demand and forced major production cuts at mills like ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor.
A five-year gap separates the 2009 notices from the 2017 filing, suggesting either genuine stabilization or incomplete data capture. The uptick in 2019 and 2020, with six notices combined, indicates renewed weakness. The 2020 notices include the pandemic-related Ameristar filings, but also steel sector reductions, pointing to convergence of cyclical (pandemic) and structural (secular steel decline) pressures.
The pattern does not show recovery. Instead, it reveals a sector experiencing episodic crises separated by periods of managed decline. Layoffs resume whenever external shocks (financial crisis, pandemic) or internal pressures (capacity underutilization, market share loss) force action. Between major notices, the city likely experienced steady attrition through normal voluntary separations, retirements, and hiring freezes—forms of employment loss not captured by WARN notices.
For a city of East Chicago's size, 3,139 documented layoffs represent catastrophic employment loss. East Chicago's total population is approximately 27,000 residents; if the city's labor force represents 40 percent of population (roughly 10,800 workers), then documented layoffs equal approximately 29 percent of total employment. This figure understates actual impact because the city's employment base has contracted, meaning current employment is lower than historical levels.
The spatial concentration of these layoffs matters enormously. East Chicago is not a diversified metropolitan area where workers can readily find alternative employment in finance, technology, healthcare, or professional services. The city lacks the economic density and institutional infrastructure of nearby Chicago. Instead, it is a industrial satellite town whose primary competitive advantage is proximity to deepwater transportation and established mill infrastructure. When that infrastructure sheds workers, alternatives are limited.
The wage impact deserves particular attention. Steel industry employment, despite cyclical instability, provides middle-class wages accessible without college degrees. A steelworker earning $55,000 to $70,000 annually supports local consumption, property values, and tax revenue. Displaced workers facing retraining or service-sector alternatives typically face wage losses of 20 to 40 percent. A steelworker transitioning to warehouse work or retail management earns substantially less, reducing household purchasing power and local economic activity.
The multiplier effects accelerate community decline. When employment drops, consumption falls, retailer revenues decline, property tax assessments fall (particularly for industrial properties where mill operational changes affect valuations), municipal revenues contract, and public services deteriorate. Schools become less competitive, infrastructure maintenance declines, and property abandonment increases. These dynamics reinforce one another.
Indiana's manufacturing sector has contracted precipitously over four decades, but the decline has not been uniform. Northern Indiana, anchored by the Gary-East Chicago steel corridor, has experienced particularly severe job loss. The region's 2000 steel employment exceeded 30,000 workers; current employment is approximately half that figure. East Chicago and Gary have lost population, tax base, and institutional capacity during this transition.
Statewide, Indiana maintains stronger manufacturing than the national average, particularly in automotive (with major OEM and supplier facilities in the state). However, this resilience has not benefited East Chicago, which specializes in the declining integrated steel segment rather than the more stable automotive supplier base. Cities like Fort Wayne and Indianapolis, with more diversified economies, have weathered manufacturing decline more successfully.
East Chicago's layoff rate appears consistent with broader northern Indiana trends, but the city's vulnerability is higher because its economy lacks diversification. A comparable city with healthcare, education, government, and technology sectors could absorb 3,139 layoffs; East Chicago cannot. The notices documented here represent selective snapshots of broader, continuous employment contraction that has reshaped the city's demographics and economic structure for two decades.
Get East Chicago Layoff Alerts
Free daily alerts for WARN Act filings in Indiana.
