WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in Topeka, Kansas, updated daily.
Workers affected by industry sector
| Company | City | Employees | Notice Date | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Villages | Topeka | 0 | 2025-09-17 | |
| The Villages Inc | Topeka | 0 | 2025-09-17 | |
| TDC Learning Center | Topeka | 0 | 2025-05-06 | |
| Penney OpCo LLC dba JCPenney | Topeka | 0 | 2025-01-27 | |
| Maximus KanCare Clearinghouse | Topeka | 122 | 2020-10-28 | |
| Topeka Capital Plaza | Topeka | 93 | 2020-04-29 | |
| Payless ShoeSource, Inc | Topeka | 211 | 2019-02-19 | |
| Durham School Services | Topeka | 97 | 2018-04-25 | |
| Payless Shoesource | Topeka | 48 | 2018-01-26 | |
| Payless Shoesource | Topeka | 170 | 2017-11-16 | |
| Select Medical Corporation | Topeka | 97 | 2015-03-04 | |
| Athene | Topeka | 204 | 2014-01-23 | |
| Northrop Brumman | Topeka | 149 | 2012-10-31 | |
| Hallmark | Topeka | 238 | 2012-10-29 | |
| Jostens | Topeka | 372 | 2012-05-14 | |
| Macy's | Topeka | 86 | 2012-01-06 | |
| Jostens | Topeka | 83 | 2011-05-12 | |
| Cargill | Topeka | 52 | 2010-09-30 | |
| Boeing | Topeka | 12 | 2010-08-20 | |
| Maximus | Topeka | 129 | 2009-10-15 |
# Topeka's Layoff Crisis: A Two-Decade Pattern of Workforce Disruption
Between 2000 and 2025, Topeka, Kansas has experienced 40 WARN Act notices affecting 6,517 workers. This represents a substantial displacement crisis for a mid-sized state capital, translating to an average of 1.5 notices per year and approximately 244 workers displaced annually across two and a half decades. The aggregate figure of 6,517 affected workers exceeds 3% of Topeka's total workforce, meaning that roughly one in thirty workers has experienced a mass layoff event significant enough to trigger federal notification requirements.
The concentration of layoffs among relatively few major employers signals a vulnerable economic structure. The top five employers in the WARN data—Payless Shoesource, The Menninger Clinic, Jostens, TeleTech, and BlueCross BlueShield of Kansas—account for 3,558 workers, or 54.6% of all layoffs in the dataset. This dependency on a handful of large employers creates significant systemic risk for Topeka's economy. When any of these anchors experiences contraction, the consequences ripple through local supply chains, commercial activity, and municipal tax revenue simultaneously.
The dominance of Payless Shoesource in Topeka's layoff history reveals the broader structural collapse of traditional retail. The company filed four separate WARN notices affecting 854 workers total—representing 13.1% of all layoffs in the city. This pattern reflects not temporary adjustment but the terminal decline of brick-and-mortar footwear retail in the face of e-commerce disruption. Payless Shoesource filed its first notice in the dataset during a period when the company was already in structural decline, ultimately declaring bankruptcy in 2019 and closing all remaining U.S. stores by 2020.
Topeka's experience with Payless Shoesource demonstrates how the city bore the costs of a national retail transformation concentrated in physical stores. Each notice represented different phases of closure and consolidation, suggesting that management delayed full adjustment across multiple years, extending the period of uncertainty for workers. The presence of what appears to be duplicate entries for Payless Shoesource and Payless ShoeSource, Inc. (854 combined workers) indicates either corporate restructuring within the entity or administrative consolidation at different operational levels.
Beyond retail, the data reveals exposure to other legacy sectors experiencing secular decline. Montgomery Wards, which filed one notice affecting 122 workers, represents another casualty of retail transformation. These are not cyclical downturns but permanent structural shifts driven by consumer behavior change and technological disruption.
Healthcare represents the second-largest source of layoffs by worker count, with three notices affecting 1,497 workers. This sector's prominence in Topeka layoffs reflects both the industry's significance to the local economy and the turbulent consolidation dynamics within American healthcare.
The Menninger Clinic alone accounts for 1,400 workers across two WARN notices. The Menninger Foundation, a historic psychiatric hospital and research institution, has undergone repeated restructuring, including changes in ownership and operational focus. The sheer scale of Menninger layoffs—representing 21.5% of all Topeka layoffs—demonstrates how a single healthcare institution's strategic decisions can destabilize the entire regional labor market. When such a large employer reduces its workforce by over 1,400 positions, it simultaneously reduces demand for ancillary services, office supplies, food service, and transportation, creating cascading effects throughout the economy.
BlueCross BlueShield of Kansas, with one notice affecting 270 workers, adds further evidence that healthcare sector instability extends beyond direct care providers to insurance and administrative functions. The consolidation and efficiency-seeking behavior in health insurance has repeatedly eliminated back-office positions, and Topeka has hosted such operations, making the city vulnerable to these nationwide industry restructurings.
The Information & Technology sector generated two WARN notices affecting 865 workers, driven almost entirely by TeleTech, which filed one notice affecting 790 workers. TeleTech represents the business process outsourcing and customer service sector—a segment that built significant presence in Topeka and other mid-sized cities during the 2000s as companies sought lower-cost operations outside major metropolitan areas.
TeleTech's large layoff reflects the industry's subsequent shift toward automation, artificial intelligence, and offshoring. A 790-worker reduction from a single employer represents a massive contraction in the city's information services capacity. The company's presence in Topeka was attractive during an era when labor cost differentials justified geographic decentralization, but technological change and global competition eventually rendered such operations uncompetitive at the scale they had achieved.
The year-by-year breakdown reveals distinct periods of layoff intensity. The early 2000s saw relative stability with 2-5 notices annually, followed by a spike in 2003 (5 notices) that likely reflected post-9/11 economic adjustment. The 2008-2009 period captured the financial crisis and subsequent recession, with 2009 showing 3 notices. The recovery years of 2010-2011 showed reduced activity, but 2012 experienced a resurgence with 4 notices.
Most concerning is the 2025 data showing 4 notices already filed at the beginning of the year, suggesting that Topeka may be entering another period of significant workforce displacement. This early-year spike demands close monitoring to determine whether it represents a sustained trend or an anomalous concentration.
The temporal pattern demonstrates that Topeka experiences both cyclical layoffs tied to broader economic downturns and structural layoffs reflecting industry-specific collapse. The retail and business process outsourcing sectors have contributed disproportionately to structural displacement, while healthcare consolidation has affected the city throughout the entire period without cyclical predictability.
Beyond the three leading sectors, the remaining 30 notices affecting 1,857 workers span six other sectors with minimal representation. This fragmentation reveals both diversity and weakness. Jostens, a class ring and recognition products manufacturer, filed two notices affecting 455 workers, reflecting manufacturing sector vulnerability in Kansas. The presence of Hallmark (238 workers) indicates exposure to the greeting card industry, another sector experiencing prolonged secular decline as digital communication displaces traditional cards.
The agriculture, transportation, education, and wholesale trade sectors each generated only single notices, suggesting either that these sectors employ relatively few workers in Topeka or that when they do conduct layoffs, they tend to do so below the 50-worker WARN Act threshold. This pattern indicates that Topeka's economy, while including diverse sectors, has not achieved robust representation across multiple stable, growing industries.
The cumulative impact of 6,517 displaced workers over twenty-five years creates persistent labor market slack and skills mismatch challenges. Workers displaced from Payless Shoesource retail positions cannot easily transition to healthcare or technology roles without retraining. Those leaving Menninger Clinic positions range from psychiatrists to custodians, making aggregate workforce planning nearly impossible.
Topeka's tax base suffers directly from large employer contractions. When The Menninger Clinic reduces payroll by over 1,400 workers, state income tax revenue declines, municipal sales tax collections fall, and property tax assessments decline as commercial real estate values adjust to lower occupancy and utilization. The cumulative effect of repeated large layoffs creates a pattern of budget instability for Topeka municipal government and Shawnee County.
The city's ability to retain young talent and attract new business investment suffers when major employers repeatedly conduct large reductions. Potential residents and companies considering relocation to Topeka observe a pattern of workforce instability and declining employment in historical anchor industries. This perception, whether fully accurate or not, undermines economic development recruitment efforts.
Topeka's layoff burden must be understood within Kansas's broader economic trajectory. The state has experienced prolonged agricultural stress, manufacturing decline, and limited success in developing high-wage service or technology sectors. Topeka, as the state capital, has benefited from stable government employment, but this advantage has not offset the loss of private sector positions in retail, manufacturing, and corporate services.
Kansas unemployment rates and workforce participation trends suggest that Topeka's experience with large layoffs reflects state-level economic weakness rather than localized mismanagement. However, the concentration of layoffs in a few large employers indicates that Topeka's economic development strategy has historically relied too heavily on attracting back-office operations and supporting legacy retail infrastructure rather than fostering diverse, resilient industries.
The 2025 notices suggest that whatever adjustment period may have occurred since the 2008-2009 financial crisis has now concluded, and Topeka faces renewed pressure. Whether this reflects cyclical downturn or continued structural deterioration will become clear over the coming months. The city's economic resilience depends on developing employment in sectors beyond retail, healthcare administration, and business process outsourcing—sectors that have proven vulnerable to disruption and decline.
Get Topeka Layoff Alerts
Free daily alerts for WARN Act filings in Kansas.