WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in Ohio, Kentucky, updated daily.
Workers affected by industry sector
| Company | City | Employees | Notice Date | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armstrong Coal Prep & Dock Facility | Ohio | 12 | 2017-10-11 | |
| Equality Boot Surface Mine | Ohio | 61 | 2017-10-11 | |
| Armstrong Coal-Midway Preparation Plant | Ohio | 10 | 2015-11-02 |
# Economic Analysis: The Layoff Landscape in Ohio-Kentucky Border Region
The Ohio-Kentucky border region has experienced modest but concentrated workforce disruptions over the past decade, with three WARN notices affecting 83 workers since 2015. While this figure appears relatively small compared to major metropolitan areas, the concentrated nature of these layoffs within the extractive industries reveals vulnerabilities in a regional economy historically dependent on coal and mineral extraction. The affected workers represent real displacement in communities where alternative employment opportunities remain limited, particularly in rural counties where mining operations anchor local tax bases and employment ecosystems.
These layoffs cluster heavily in the energy sector, which has faced sustained headwinds from national market forces and regulatory changes. The 83 displaced workers, though a modest absolute number, signals meaningful economic stress in a region where unemployment rates can spike sharply following major facility closures. Understanding the composition and timing of these notices provides insight into the structural challenges facing Ohio's mining-dependent communities.
The layoff data reveals a clear concentration among coal-related enterprises. Equality Boot Surface Mine filed a single WARN notice affecting 61 workers, representing 73 percent of all displaced workers in the dataset. This dominant employer account underscores the outsized vulnerability of the region to decisions by individual extractive industry operators. The facility's workforce reduction reflects broader trends in coal mining, where automation, declining demand, and tighter environmental regulations have fundamentally altered operations.
The secondary employers filing notices—Armstrong Coal Prep & Dock Facility and Armstrong Coal-Midway Preparation Plant—together account for 22 workers across two separate notices. These operations, which provide coal preparation and logistics services, sit downstream from primary mining operations. Their workforce reductions likely follow directly from reduced throughput originating at sites like Equality Boot, illustrating how layoffs cascade through supply chains in extractive industries. When a major mining operation reduces output, preparation facilities and dock operations face declining work volumes, forcing proportional workforce cuts.
The geographic concentration of these employers within the Ohio-Kentucky border region, combined with their shared dependence on coal throughput, creates compounding vulnerability. A single unfavorable market condition or regulatory change can trigger coordinated workforce reductions across multiple firms within months or a few years, as evidenced by the 2017 twin notices affecting Armstrong facilities.
Mining and energy operations account for 12 workers across one notice, while manufacturing represents 10 workers across a separate notice. This breakdown reflects the reality that most layoff activity emanates from primary coal extraction rather than secondary processing or manufacturing. The dominance of raw mineral extraction in the layoff notices—73 percent of all displaced workers at Equality Boot—indicates that mechanization and productivity improvements at extraction sites drive the majority of workforce reductions rather than broader manufacturing decline.
The two-year gap between the 2015 notice and the 2017 notices suggests layoffs responded to specific market conditions or operational decisions rather than representing a continuous, linear decline. Coal prices fluctuated significantly during this period, and regulatory pressures from environmental agencies intensified. The clustering of two notices in 2017 indicates that year witnessed concentrated economic stress in the sector, potentially coinciding with sharper coal price declines or accelerated shift away from coal-dependent energy generation.
The absence of WARN notices after 2017 in this dataset does not necessarily indicate stabilization. Large companies operating in extractive industries may employ attrition, voluntary separation programs, or hours reductions rather than formal layoffs large enough to trigger WARN notice thresholds. Some displaced workers may have been absorbed through voluntary early retirement packages rather than involuntary separations, which would not generate WARN filing requirements.
The three notices distributed across 2015 and 2017 represent an episodic rather than continuous pattern of layoffs. A single notice in 2015 affected Equality Boot, followed by two notices two years later affecting Armstrong facilities. This temporal distribution suggests the region has not experienced steady workforce contraction but rather acute shocks tied to specific business decisions or market inflection points.
Without data extending beyond 2017, projecting forward trends requires caution, but the underlying structural headwinds facing coal remain intact. National coal consumption has declined persistently due to natural gas price advantages, renewable energy cost reductions, and power generation portfolio shifts toward lower-carbon sources. These macro forces create a declining ceiling for employment in Appalachian coal mining. The fact that only three formal WARN notices were filed across this region over seven years may reflect either smaller-scale adjustments occurring below WARN thresholds or consolidation among remaining operators.
The 2015-2017 period coincided with particular stress in coal markets following the 2015 peak in natural gas production and the accelerating retirement of coal-fired generating stations nationwide. The timing of layoffs aligns with these broader market pressures.
In rural Ohio and Kentucky counties dependent on coal operations, the displacement of 83 workers concentrates significant economic shock. These are not workers easily transitioning to alternative employment; mining positions typically represent high-wage jobs relative to other available opportunities in rural Appalachia. Equality Boot's 61-worker reduction alone represents 73 percent of regional WARN-triggered displacement, making this single facility's workforce decision the dominant labor market event of the period.
Multiplier effects amplify initial layoff impacts. Displaced miners and facility workers reduce spending in local retail, services, and housing markets. Property tax revenues decline when extractive operations reduce operational scale. School funding tied to county property tax bases faces pressure. The secondary impacts on local suppliers, restaurants, automotive services, and other service providers add to initial job losses.
The concentration of job losses within single facilities also suggests limited shock-absorption capacity. Communities lacking economic diversification face sharper poverty and unemployment increases when major employers contract. Workers may face relocation decisions, particularly younger workers with fewer deep community ties, representing net outmigration of working-age population and human capital.
The Ohio-Kentucky border region's layoff pattern reflects conditions specific to Appalachian coal mining rather than representing broader Ohio economic trends. Metropolitan Ohio regions including Columbus, Cleveland, and Cincinnati have experienced diverse economic bases insulating them from coal sector volatility. The border region's extractive industry concentration distinguishes it from state-level patterns.
Kentucky's coal industry faces even more severe structural headwinds than border regions, as Eastern Kentucky contains the nation's largest coal reserves but faces declining demand. The three notices documented here represent primarily Ohio-side operations, suggesting the border region's Ohio portion retains somewhat greater stability than directly adjacent Kentucky mining zones. However, the shared watershed and regional labor market mean Kentucky coal sector stress inevitably affects Ohio communities through supply chain relationships and labor market dynamics.
The modest scale of documented layoffs relative to the population potentially masked larger-scale attrition and voluntary separation activity occurring below WARN thresholds, suggesting actual displacement may exceed formal notice filings.
Get Ohio Layoff Alerts
Free daily alerts for WARN Act filings in Kentucky.
