WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in Waterbury, Connecticut, updated daily.
Workers affected by industry sector
Workers affected by notice type
Waterbury, Connecticut has experienced a substantial workforce disruption in recent years, with 19 WARN (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification) Act filings affecting 1,174 workers across the city. This figure represents a significant employment shock for a mid-sized Connecticut municipality, particularly given the concentration of these losses among relatively few employers. To contextualize this disruption: if Waterbury's labor force stands at approximately 50,000 workers (consistent with similar-sized Connecticut cities), the 1,174 affected workers represent roughly 2.35 percent of the total employment base. While this may appear modest in isolation, the clustering of these layoffs among essential service sectors—particularly healthcare and food retail—amplifies their local economic significance and cascading effects throughout the community.
The temporal distribution of these layoffs reveals a pronounced acceleration beginning in 2023, marking a critical inflection point in Waterbury's recent employment trajectory. The city experienced relatively stable conditions from 2015 through 2022, with scattered WARN notices totaling just five filings. However, 2023 witnessed a sharp uptick with six notices, followed by a concerning escalation in 2025 with seven notices already filed. This recent surge suggests structural rather than cyclical pressures on Waterbury's economy, indicating that employers face persistent challenges that extend beyond temporary market corrections.
The layoff landscape in Waterbury is characterized by concentration risk, with a handful of major employers accounting for a disproportionate share of workforce reductions. Abbott Terrace Health Center and ShopRite of Waterbury, LLC emerge as the largest single-event displacement events, each affecting 209 and 203 workers respectively. These two employers alone represent 350 workers, or nearly 30 percent of all WARN-reported job losses in the city.
The ShopRite filings warrant particular attention because they appear to represent duplicate reporting of a single layoff event rather than two separate incidents. The dual filings for ShopRite of Waterbury, LLC and ShopRite—both reporting 203 affected workers—likely indicate administrative consolidation or corrected filings rather than additive losses. Regardless of this data anomaly, the retail grocery sector's presence among top displacement events reflects the ongoing structural decline in traditional retail employment, accelerated by e-commerce competition and automation of store operations.
Waterbury Gardens Nursing and Rehab LLC presents a more complex picture through multiple WARN filings with varying worker counts (125 workers, 0 workers following an update, and earlier notices totaling to updates). These sequential notices, including a 9/6/2023 update reflecting zero workers, suggest facility consolidation, operational restructuring, or possible corrections to initial filings. Nevertheless, the healthcare provider's multiple filings indicate sustained organizational stress rather than a single discrete event.
Mercury Fuel Service, Inc. filed a notice affecting 112 workers, representing a significant displacement in the specialized fuels distribution sector. This particular case deserves investigation as it may reflect broader energy sector restructuring or regional supply chain consolidation affecting Connecticut's industrial base.
Manufacturing employers including Rheem Manufacturing Company (76 workers) and its Eemax Division (78 workers) together account for 154 workers across two filings. These notices suggest either divisional restructuring within Rheem's Waterbury operations or separate facility closures within the same corporate entity. Rheem's presence among Waterbury's largest layoff sources reflects the persistent challenges facing Connecticut's manufacturing sector amid global competition and automation pressures.
The industry breakdown reveals a stark concentration of layoffs in healthcare, which accounts for eight WARN notices affecting 379 workers—representing 32.3 percent of all affected workers despite comprising less than half the total notices. This disproportionate impact reflects healthcare's significant employment base in Waterbury, where nursing homes, rehabilitation centers, and long-term care facilities represent a critical pillar of local employment.
The specific facilities affected—Abbott Terrace Health Center, Waterbury Gardens Nursing and Rehab LLC, and Rosegarden Health and Rehabilitation Center—indicate systemic pressure on the long-term care sector. These facilities operate under intense cost constraints from Medicaid reimbursement rates, staffing shortages, and increasing operational complexity. The layoffs likely reflect reduced census (fewer patients), operational consolidation, or shifts in staffing models toward reduced-hour or contingent positions. Connecticut's aging population should theoretically support long-term care employment growth, yet these notices demonstrate that structural factors—particularly low Medicaid reimbursement rates and competition from newer facilities in adjacent markets—are forcing consolidation and workforce reductions despite demographic tailwinds.
Manufacturing's two filings affecting 154 workers (13.1 percent of total displacement) underscore the enduring fragility of Connecticut's industrial base. The Rheem notices and Mercury Fuel Service filing suggest that specialized manufacturing and distribution sectors cannot rely on stable demand or stable labor economics. The fact that a diversified company like Rheem maintains Waterbury operations at all reflects historical industrial legacy rather than contemporary competitive advantage in global manufacturing markets.
Notably, the "other" categories—retail, head start programs, construction, and unclassified sectors—comprise a substantial portion of notices and workers, reflecting the broad-based nature of Waterbury's employment disruptions. Community Development Institute Head Start affecting 56 workers suggests federal funding pressures or program restructuring in early childhood education. Feeney Brothers Excavation, LLC, with five separate WARN filings tracking down from 37 workers to ultimately 6 workers, exemplifies construction sector volatility and the practice of revised filings as projects are canceled or scaled back.
Waterbury's layoff pattern from 2015 through 2022 exhibits relative stability, with single notices filed in 2015, 2018, and 2021, and a minor increase to two notices in 2022. This baseline suggests that Waterbury experienced relatively typical workforce adjustment dynamics during the recovery from the 2008-2009 financial crisis and through the pre-pandemic economic expansion. The initial pandemic year (2021) generated only a single WARN notice, implying that Waterbury's essential service sectors (healthcare, retail) maintained relatively stable employment through the acute COVID-19 phase.
The inflection point emerges unmistakably in 2023, when WARN filings doubled to six notices. This acceleration coincides with broader Connecticut economic headwinds—post-pandemic labor market tightening, inflationary pressure on operating costs, rising interest rates constraining capital investment, and structural challenges in retail and healthcare. The 2024 lull with just one filing suggests a temporary plateau rather than stabilization, as 2025 has already generated seven notices, surpassing any prior single year.
This trajectory indicates that Waterbury is not experiencing a cyclical downturn amenable to traditional stimulus or countercyclical policies. Instead, the pattern suggests that employers face persistent structural challenges—labor cost pressures in healthcare, retail disruption, manufacturing competition, and possibly regional population shifts—that demand permanent workforce adjustments rather than temporary layoffs. The shift from single, isolated displacement events to clusters of notices across multiple sectors signals a more systemic economic realignment.
The displacement of 1,174 workers carries profound local implications that extend far beyond the immediate job losses. In healthcare particularly, where Abbott Terrace and Waterbury Gardens collectively eliminated over 334 positions (accounting for administrative duplication), these are not entry-level roles easily replaced elsewhere. Licensed nursing staff, healthcare administrators, and specialized technicians face genuine geographic constraints on reemployment options within their sectors and wage expectations.
For retail workers affected by the ShopRite closure, the situation presents acute challenges. Grocery retail positions typically offer modest wages, limited advancement, and increasingly contingent scheduling. The displacement of 203 retail workers into a market where retail employment itself faces secular decline (driven by online grocery delivery services and automation) creates genuine hardship. Unlike healthcare or manufacturing positions, which often command above-median wages, grocery retail workers rarely earn sufficient wages to sustain rapid reemployment after extended joblessness.
Waterbury's economy depends significantly on healthcare and public sector employment, which together provide the employment stability that has sustained the city through deindustrialization. Healthcare sector layoffs directly threaten this stabilizing foundation. Moreover, if healthcare facilities are consolidating operations or reducing beds, this reflects declining demand that may relate to population outmigration—a concerning signal for Waterbury's demographic trajectory and tax base.
The cumulative wage impact of these 1,174 displaced workers likely exceeds $30 million annually, assuming an average wage of $28,000 (conservative given healthcare's presence in the mix). Lost wages translate directly to reduced consumer spending in Waterbury's retail economy, compounding effects beyond the directly affected workers. Unemployment insurance benefits provide temporary cushioning, but the 26-week benefit window leaves long-term dislocated workers vulnerable.
Connecticut as a whole faces similar structural employment challenges, though the state's composition differs from Waterbury. The state maintains stronger financial services and insurance sectors (concentrated in Hartford and Stamford), biotechnology and pharmaceutical clusters (Connecticut Valley), and higher education anchors. Waterbury lacks these sectoral anchors, leaving it more exposed to the decline of traditional manufacturing and the fragility of healthcare operations in an era of cost containment.
Waterbury's experience aligns with broader Connecticut trends of modest but persistent layoff activity in healthcare, retail, and specialized manufacturing. However, Waterbury's concentration in these vulnerable sectors—combined with the absence of diversified employment alternatives—makes the city more economically brittle than affluent suburbs or major employment centers. While Connecticut statewide may absorb workforce disruptions across diverse sectors and geographies, Waterbury's dependence on a narrower employment base amplifies local impact.
The 2025 surge merits close monitoring as a potential harbinger of broader Connecticut economic stress. If Waterbury's employers are responding to deteriorating market conditions rather than temporary adjustments, similar pressures should manifest across other mid-sized Connecticut cities within months. Conversely, if Waterbury's experience remains localized, it may indicate sector-specific or facility-specific challenges rather than broader regional economic weakness.
Get Waterbury Layoff Alerts
Free daily alerts for WARN Act filings in Connecticut.
