WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in Clear, Alaska, updated daily.
| Company | City | Employees | Notice Date | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleut O&M Services, LLC | Clear | 74 | 2018-07-02 | |
| BAE Systems | Clear | 101 | 2018-06-25 | |
| Arctec Services | Clear | 171 | 2006-06-20 |
# Economic Analysis of Layoffs in Clear, Alaska
Clear, Alaska has experienced three WARN Act notices affecting 346 workers since 2006, positioning the community within a narrow but meaningful segment of Alaska's layoff landscape. While three notices across a 12-year period might suggest modest disruption, the concentration of these reductions in a small community like Clear carries disproportionate economic weight. A loss of 346 jobs in a city with a population base as limited as Clear represents a significant labor market shock, particularly when those positions represent skilled, well-compensated employment tied to defense contracting and infrastructure maintenance.
The temporal clustering of these layoffs reveals an important vulnerability pattern. Two of the three notices occurred in 2018, suggesting a concentrated period of workforce restructuring rather than gradual erosion. This clustering effect can amplify community-level economic damage compared to distributed job losses spread across multiple years, as it limits the labor market's capacity to absorb displaced workers through natural attrition and redeployment.
Three companies account for all recorded WARN activity in Clear, with Arctec Services leading with a single notice affecting 171 workers. This represents nearly half of all documented layoffs in the city over the 12-year period. BAE Systems, a global defense contractor with significant Alaska operations, follows with 101 affected workers from one notice. Aleut O&M Services, LLC rounds out the trio with 74 workers affected from a single filing.
The prominence of defense-related contractors in Clear's economy is unmistakable. Both Arctec Services and BAE Systems operate within Alaska's defense industrial base, which centers heavily on military installations and related infrastructure. Clear's geographic position and its relationship to military operations in Interior Alaska make it a logical hub for these contractors. The Defense Department's personnel decisions, budget cycles, and base restructuring initiatives directly cascade into local employment disruptions.
Arctec Services emerged as the single largest source of layoff activity, suggesting either a major restructuring of a core contract or a decisive business pivot. The loss of 171 workers from one employer represents a severe contraction in a community the size of Clear. Without access to the specific timing of this notice within the 2006-2018 window, the precise nature of this reduction remains unclear, but such a substantial single-employer layoff typically signals either major contract completion, consolidation with another firm, or significant operational reorientation.
BAE Systems, as a publicly traded defense prime, operates within different constraints than regional contractors. Its decision to reduce the Clear workforce by 101 positions likely reflects broader corporate restructuring, the consolidation of operations, or the wind-down of a specific defense program. BAE Systems maintains substantial footprints across Alaska's defense landscape, but decisions to reduce one location often accompany geographic consolidation or efficiency initiatives that spare other facilities.
The absence of formally classified industry data presents an analytical constraint, but the employer roster itself reveals the sectoral composition with clarity. Clear's economy appears heavily weighted toward defense contracting and related infrastructure services, with no evidence of manufacturing, extraction, or traditional commercial sectors in the WARN data.
This concentration carries both advantages and risks. Defense sector employment typically offers above-average compensation and stable, long-term contracts during periods of political support for military spending. However, it exposes the community to federal budget decisions, geopolitical shifts, and strategic force structure changes entirely beyond local control. The 2018 clustering of two layoff notices suggests that year may have brought convergent pressures—perhaps a defense budget reorientation, the completion of major infrastructure projects, or consolidation initiatives affecting multiple contractors simultaneously.
The reliance on contract-based employment creates structural vulnerability. Unlike integrated regional economies with diverse employer bases, Clear's workforce depends on the renewal and expansion of specific government contracts. When multiple contracts restructure in proximity, the community lacks alternative employment pathways to absorb displaced workers.
The distribution of notices across time—one in 2006 and two in 2018—does not suggest a linear trend toward increasing layoffs. Rather, it indicates episodic disruption separated by extended periods of relative stability. This pattern is characteristic of communities dependent on large, lumpy government contracts rather than those experiencing gradual economic decline.
The 12-year gap between the 2006 notice and the 2018 pair suggests that intervening years brought either employment growth or at least workforce stability sufficient to avoid triggering additional WARN notices. This gap also implies that the 2018 disruptions did not represent a continuation of deteriorating conditions, but rather new or independent shocks to the local labor market.
Whether post-2018 years have brought further disruptions cannot be determined from available data, but the absence of recorded notices suggests either workforce stability or the possibility that recent reductions may have fallen below WARN Act thresholds (notices typically cover reductions of 50 or more workers, though state-specific rules can vary).
For a community the size of Clear, the displacement of 346 workers carries cascading economic consequences. These are not abstract statistical losses but represent household income destruction, reduced consumer spending, and diminished tax bases for local services and schools. Each worker laid off represents lost purchasing power that reverberates through local retail, services, and community-dependent businesses.
The composition of these jobs matters enormously. Defense contracting and infrastructure maintenance positions typically offer compensation well above regional medians, meaning the average wage loss per displaced worker likely exceeds state-level unemployment compensation replacement rates. Workers cannot easily step into comparable positions within the immediate labor market, creating incentives for out-migration of skilled personnel.
Housing markets in resource-dependent communities often experience downward pressure when major employers contract. Homeowners tied to properties lose both equity and mobility, while landlords face vacancy and rent pressure. The concentration of job losses in 2018 would have produced precisely these secondary effects.
Alaska's economy has experienced periodic defense-related disruptions and infrastructure workforce fluctuations throughout the past two decades. Clear's experience—concentrated losses among defense contractors with extended periods of stability—mirrors patterns visible statewide. However, larger Alaskan cities like Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau possess diversified economies that cushion individual employer shocks.
Clear's vulnerability differs in degree and kind. Lacking urban diversification, the city cannot absorb workforce disruptions through alternative employment sectors. The loss of defense jobs in Anchorage spreads across a population of nearly 300,000 and an economy with healthcare, retail, tourism, and service sectors. The loss of 171 positions in Clear creates a proportionally more severe disruption.
Alaska's defense-dependent economy as a whole tracks federal spending decisions, strategic force structure reviews, and Pentagon efficiency initiatives. Communities like Clear exist at the far end of this dependency chain, experiencing amplified vulnerability to national-level decisions. The documented WARN notices in Clear represent not isolated local events but expressions of broader strategic or budgetary shifts within the American defense enterprise, filtered through Alaska's geography and infrastructure requirements.
Get Clear Layoff Alerts
Free daily alerts for WARN Act filings in Alaska.
